This background/nationality/culture whatever argument is just nuts. The guy will primarily be remembered as a murdering nutcase and if the stuff about bullying etc is true, then a murdering nutcase with a sad background, but that's it. Nationality, culture, religion and the types of passports he owned will be irrelevant.
He just will not score too highly in the spree shooter all-time list.
"It's just like I always said! You can do battle with strength, you can do battle with wits, but no weapon can beat a great pair of tits!"
Maybe a case of dictionary-phobia?homophobia
ˌhɒməˈfəʊbɪə,ˌhəʊmə-/Skicka
noun
dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people.
- - - Updated - - -
I like the fact you think the death of people is hilarious. Says everything really. I mean what's the point of a shooting if you can't attempt to score points on a forum right?
I don't follow your logic. You say that, for example, an Afghani raised new Yorker did the shooting, implying that him being Afghani matters in any way. So I'm asking: does it also matter in case of Breivik? That is, if an ethnical Afghani doing the shooting is an indication of Afghani being more inclined to do that, then does an ethnical Norwegian doing a shooting is an indication of Norwegians being more inclined to do that?
Or does ethnicity only matter if the person is a Muslim, but doesn't in other cases? Because that seems to be the case from what you've been saying.