If Kerry or his friends wants to buy everybody a new air conditioning system then ok lets do it.
Otherwise changing the refrigerant requires changing coils at both the condenser and handler plus the in line set and the dryer then having micron-filtration done on the new loop then the addition of however many pounds of 401A the system needs.
This is expensive and at the end of the day you have a system with a very low seer rating compared to modern units that cost you several thousand dollars.
And if the seer rating is too low the AC tech, if licensed, may not even be legally allowed to do the conversion.
Overall the regulations are designed specifically to force people into upgrading, there are no market factors driving these costs its purely regulation, and that hurts low income families.
Not sure where you're from but over here in the US HVAC = lots of regulations = lots of $$$.
Last edited by TrumpIsPresident; 2016-07-24 at 01:45 AM.
MAGA
When all you do is WIN WIN WIN
ITT: The American response to Climate Change is to turn up the AC...
To be perfectly honest, this whole 'I believe in climate change, I just don't think we're affecting it' is really tiresome. What you really want to say is that you deny man's contribution to climate change, which is quite honestly not an improvement over simply denying that climate can change at all.
Because unlike politics, or history, or w/e, science does not operate on the idea that the truth lies in the middle. Halfway between right and wrong is still wrong.
He said it's equally important to deal with a huge environmental problem. That's it.
ISIS is an immediate threat, a short-term threat. The environment going haywire is a grand threat, a long-term threat. Both are equally important to tackle and we can't afford to just be shortsighted and act in the moment but for the future.
Besides, white and black people kill more than ISIS does in the US so...technically he's right, ISIS isn't a big threat to the US.
Climate change is, at it's core, a statistical theory. You can't pin down a specific event any more than I can tell you the speed and position of any particle in a gas.
This is the crux of the issue. The fundamental misunderstanding. Climate is statistical. That's why everything is given in averages and trends. That's why nobody tells you when the next hurricane caused by climate change will hit. Because you're asking for something the theory never said it could do, and ignoring everything that it does say.
Let me explain again the statistical mechanics example I wrote a few pages back. If you increase the volume of a container of gas while maintaining the pressure, the temperature increases according to the ideal gas law. As the temperature of the box increases, the average speed of the molecules increases.
Can statistical mechanics tell you what the speed or position of a given particle will be at any given time? No. Can statistical mechanics tell you that the increase in speed for a given particle was definitely due to the increase in volume? No. Your reasoning would conclude that the increase in volume is not causing an increase in the average speed of the particles, because you directly link any of the speed increases to the volume increase.
With that in mind, even asking when the next climate change event will happen is a terrible question. Because it's not even a question that makes sense, any more than asking statistical mechanics to predict when particle 5328 in a box will have a speed of 10 m/s.
- - - Updated - - -
This isn't even a response to the post you quoted. It's a response to something else that you simply repeated.
Bruh if you you take away my AC, I'll be more of a threat to you than ISIS.
It's been 95 + today with 100% humidity. The "feels like" temp is 110. Hell that's probably why ISIS is so mad. It's hot over there too, and they ain't got no AC. At least they don't have the humidity though. You walk outside for 10 sec here and you underwear gets wet.
Sentimentallity and emotional outbursts have no place in the long-term political, economical and environmental policy-making. An appeal to emotion is also a fallacy. It doesn't make environmental decisions any less important or meaningful that you have an easier time getting upset about ISIS.
But I guess you could go tell the victims of Katrina that dealing with natural disasters and environmental issues isn't important and see how THEY react.