What do you mean by "defending" Quran? Defending from what? Someone is going to burn Quran at the central square in Paris, and someone else is defending the book with their life?
Pretty much every Religious Education lesson, having a devout Christian teach you about the bible as an actual GCSE (UK thing) course that you had to take. No mention of other religions at all, which is a shame, as I'd probably have enjoyed questioning those views as much as I did the Bible's view.
Some Muslims are more progressive than Christians.
The reactionary stuff is more to do with growing up in harsh enviroments where strict social codes are necessary for survival. A few generations in a liberal democracy and they become like western catholics, paying lip service to stuff in a mosque but otherwise essentially the same as everyone else.
Ok yes, it is a book.
People who study and learned the book can contradict themselves as much as they want. The Quran just tells you that if you do not fully understand something, ask the people who know about it.
It also tells you to double check what you learn.
I also stated that it has not been changed because the point I am trying to make is that every other book has been added to and removed from as the followers saw fit.
Topic is why we are defending the Quran, correct?
Me stating that the Quran has not been changed is why I believe in it.
People have tried to edit and play with the Quran, but people have it memorized from cover to cover so it's not as easy to publish a fake Quran and have it thrown around without anyone noticing, which is what is happening to the bible right now.
I don't need your approval for anything. I'm merely stating that Christians and Muslims (and Jews) worship the same God.
- - - Updated - - -
Just because it hasn't been changed as many times as other books, does not make its pages more valid.
If I change your quote multiple times as I see fit, can I still call it a quote?
quote
kwəʊt/Submit
verb
1.
repeat or copy out (words from a text or speech written or spoken by another person).
That's the point I'm trying to make.
When you change a religious book as much as the bible has been changed, you really can't call it a bible anymore. It's hundreds of additions and removals and versions upon versions that you can't find the truth in it anymore.
You can continue to believe anything you want as long as people are free to criticize however they like. I don't see anything wrong with people defending all these holy books without reading it as long as other people can call them out on it.
The thing is people get very sensitive when it comes to religions more so than any other types of ideologies thus making it so that you must "respect" others's religious beliefs but somehow criticizing something like rightist and lefting ideologies is fine.
Last edited by Wildmoon; 2016-07-25 at 11:09 AM.