Wasn't he all "Um, you know I'm an actor, right?"
Jeffery Toobin on CNN said it was totally understandable that Trump wants a debate with no moderators because he doesn't want anyone fact checking him and the problem with fact checkers is that only liberals are fact checkers.
Which shows you a lot about the Republicans, in that they are not fact checkers nor do they care for facts to be checked.
Lol wut. The usual victim complex I guess. I've seen plenty of Hillary bashing and flaming without a single infraction. There's also conspiracy theories flying around about her. You know, all of that stuff about her having hundreds of people assassinated. That's technically against the rules, but none of them get infracted. The anti-Hillary stuff is blatantly against the rules in so many ways but goes unmoderated, so your complaints are lol-worthy.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Why post rules if they aren't to be followed? Where's the line? Can I call you a distasteful faggot because somebody posts a conspiracy in another thread? I'm not a vicitim, nor am I playing the victim card. You just can't see bias because you are incapable of not being a ctr shill. Objectivity waved bye bye to you ages ago my friend
Trump finally got asked directly today about his Foundation scandal:
Mmmmm word salad.BG: "And with the Washington Post report out this week about the Trump Foundation. Could you explain to people why you may have used some charitable donations for personal uses?
Trump: "The foundation is really rare. It gives money to that. It's really been doing a good job. I think we put that to sleep just by putting out the last report."
Next week's debate is going to be delicious.
Help control the population. Have your blood elf spayed or neutered.
"According to the 2010 U.S. Census, these cities comprised 55.2% of Iowa's black population. Of a total 2008 U.S. Census estimated population of 99,514, 9.2 percent - or 9,200 citizens are African-American. For comparison, the average African-American population in Iowa cities is 2.5 percent."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa...avenport,_Iowa
With African American's averaging 2.5% of the population in Iowa cities, is it any surprise that when Trump gives a speech in an Iowa city that there are almost no black people in the crowd.
Again, unless there was a litmus test that kept black people from attending, you don't have a point. Anyone who wants to go, can go. If there are so few black people, who's to blame? Do you want Trump to force black people to attend his rallies to make people like you happy?
A 100% failure rate can be debunked by pointing to a single black person who's attended a Trump rally and thought that he did well. But you did throw in a weasle word, "actual black people". Don't tell me you're going to claim that black people who agree with Trump aren't "actually" black people. You're not going to be that overtly racist are you?
You responded with this lengthy post within minutes, don't pretend you actually watched any significant portion of that nearly two hour video.
Moreover, there's no reasonable rebuttal here. You critiqued Trump for not speaking infront of black people enough, and I'm giving you examples of large black churches. I'm sorry some of Trump's entourage was white, and I'm sorry some of the front row seats were reserved for some white press members, but that was a black church. At some point you have to let go of your bias and at least concede a point.
So long as Bishop Jackson asked what he wanted to ask, what's the problem? Sure, keep in mind that Trump's answers will sound more polished but so long as he wasn't asked easy questions there shouldn't be an issue to any reasonable person.
Moreover, the interview was aired to a mostly black audience. There isn't a big difference between an interview on TV and having a live audience so long as the footage isn't edited too heavily or purposefully.
That article jumped the gun, apparently. Notice the future tense of the wording in the title.
- http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/03/politi...oters-detroit/Originally Posted by CNN
Ouch, CNN even described his message as being warmly received. How do you contort reality to include such an even happening? CNN must be lying, Trump has the authors wife hostage, right?
If the context of his speech was modern day, and all of his references were modern day, what's the take away message a reasonable person would have?
Oh I'm sure you could try and change the subject when you're shown to be wrong...
Last edited by Taneras; 2016-09-21 at 11:47 PM.
The irony of complaining about mods not following the rules, by breaking the rule of not discussing moderating. That rule alone makes each and every complaint such as your, completley transparent that forum rules has nothing to do with this. Objectivity might have gone away, but irony is stronger than ever.
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
Me and a couple others who called satimy a white supremacist because.... wait for it.... he was espousing white supremacist view points.
He was talking about race replacement, the death of "white culture", and the turning of the US into third world status due to latin american immigration, if I remember correctly.
He got upset that we called him what he basically is - a white supremacist - doesn't like to hear the truth about himself I guess. He also reported us for calling him that. Needless to say none of us got banned.