Originally Posted by
Lenonis
I've noticed this trend when people try to defend the right wing on gay rights issues they fall back on attacking the term "homophobic".
Because apparently it needs to be explained that terms can be used in looser ways than their original greek root term meanings.
It's like when people call the muslim ban racist. Yes, a religion isn't a race, but everyone KNOWS what is meant by that. Everyone KNOWS what is meant when a stance is called homophobic even if it's not an actual fear.
Seems to me like it's a sign of a group of people that can't really argue the point. I don't really know why people are reluctant to admit the GOP is an anti-gay party -- it's in their platform, their elected officials are very open about it. It's not a secret nor is it something that is hard to spot.
Not everyone in the GOP is anti-gay though -- as I linked earlier 30% of the party does support gay marriage. You have log cabin republicans and such. So you can definitely make the case that it's not a 100% held view, but the party as a whole...in otherwords a majority (which was my original phrasing) is anti-gay.
Really don't know why people are trying to defend it. I mean the party's officials don't even defend it. *Shrug*