-Clear evidence of massive conflicts of interest like the meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton just prior to the first Comey announcement
-The president issuing an order that the Clinton Foundation was off limits to investigation
first two things that come to mind in relation to current events.
Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. -Bertrand Russell
Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Try to be more specific.
- - - Updated - - -
That's not a conflict of interest. You haven't shown they even discussed the investigation, let alone that she leaned on Comey.
Link?-The president issuing an order that the Clinton Foundation was off limits to investigation
Probably because your standard for evidence is "the bare minimum I can use to construct the reality I want".
Claiming that the entire DoJ is not honest because one time Lynch met with an old friend while a separate agency was investigating his wife is stupid in the extreme.
I, for one, can't wait to find out what's in these new Clinton e-mails. I need some new recipes to try.
Correlation does not equal causation. We learn this basic concept when in high school. For your argument to have merit, you must be able to prove the two things are linked. A hunch does not prove a link. What a friend or family member said does not prove a link. What a news report says does not prove a link, although the news report might cite a source that does prove a link (less and less common with "social media journalism", however.)
I could claim that Trump is in bed with Putin because of the possible link represented by a Trump server being in private, direct contact with two servers at Russia's largest and most successful private financial institution but because there is no actual proof of such an agreement, it'd just be a crock of shit. Exactly like what all this nonsense about "Benghazi" and "emails" and "corruption" is.
Unless you have proof, of course. I'm sure the entire fucking country would love for you to provide it. Hell, Putin would probably cream his pants.
- - - Updated - - -
B-b-but senpai, I'm not that kind of woman~
One you want to read into is Peter Kadzik: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/...rge_of_wiener/ - https://twitter.com/search?q=peter+kadzik
No, I wanted your reasons for believing that it violated. Now that you clarified that it comes from the FBI statement, let's go to the next step. Why didn't Comey recommend persecution?
- - - Updated - - -
Someone posted this like a year ago and I still get a kick out if it:
https://youtu.be/y3z841UJiVk
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi