Last Sunday's grocery trip. Spent $36. Still have some food left from then. Bought mostly fruits, vegetables, potatoes, milk and a bit of chicken. Had near-free rice stored at home. Can't imagine how anyone who doesn't eat like elephant would need more food than that...
So, first you complain that people can't move out of their parents' homes, and now you say that if you moved out, you would lose all enjoyment from your life. So which one is it? And you definitely can work 40 hours a week and move out, that's not even a question. Especially since you live with your parents; it means you would generate like $1,500 extra income monthly.
---
I moved to the US from freaking Russia, with $50/m income, lol. Cry me a river about hard-hard life of American people.
If we switch it over to whole chickens, stews, beef, pasta, various veggies, curries, rice, and so on, that'd be a mixed, healthy diet, for way less than $14/person/day.
- - - Updated - - -
I still have no idea what you're eating that costs this. I eat more like 3K calories per day and when I'm cooking at home it doesn't cost anywhere near that much. It's not like I'm frugal, it's just not hard to buy some beef, pasta (or rice), and vegetables and toss together a pretty good meal. Fruit or ice cream for dessert as desired.
I'm all for having a strong safety net like Denmark has but there is no reason why there welfare department cannot make requirements that their people are seeking employment, seeking some kind of trade training or getting an education. In America, if you are on food assistance, you must attend classes that help you find a job. Classes on resume writing, interviewing, and computer skills classes. I see no reason why Denmark cant apply this as well while still providing the same amount of benefits. If you don't attend the required meetings for American food assistance, they take your benefits away. I didn't go to college. I always had to work full time. I'm not very good at going to work and school at the same time. I would love to have been a Danish citizen, receive social services and attended college so that I could have a real career. Not really for the money but it would be nice to make more money. I would want it more so that I was doing closer to what I really wanted to do for a living.
That is what it's like. The one job I've held in my life where I would earn money to comfortably live on my own (excessively so really) required I work six days a week 12 hours a day. It wasn't a job I held long because I had absolutely no life while I was working there. It was actually depressing to work there and not be able to do anything.
It depends were you are at, prices vary widely and remember even my state is roughly the same size as Germany and it's one of 50 states.
We pay less than $200 a month on groceries for the two of us but we do a lot of our own cooking. What's bad is when you eat at restaurants a lot, very expensive.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
Let me draw a picture of how cheap I used to live here, when I just came. This place is far from the worst in the US:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Bend,_Indiana
So, leggo. Monthly fees:
$285 - apartment
~$200 - food
$35 - phone
NET: $520/m.
(insurance is provided by the employer)
Apartment - found an offer for craigslist; folks were looking for a roommate.
Food - like I said before, $200 goes a long way here. If I really-really tried, I could probably cut food expenses to $100, while still eating somewhat healthy, but whatever.
Phone - basically it: I just need it to phone, nothing more.
Now, minimum wage in Indiana is $7.25/h. Suppose I work 40h-weeks, so roughly 160h/m. That gives us $1,256.67 monthly, over twice what we need.
---
Sure, the life won't be fancy initially. But it is supposed to be hard. You have no career, you move out of your parents' place with no experience, no property, nothing. It will be hard everywhere, in any country. No one will give you everything on a silver spoon just because you exist. You have to put in some effort, to make some investments in your life, for it to kick in.
Like I said, I moved from Russia to the US, while making $50/m. Are you saying you can't move from your city to another, while making $1250/m? Come on, buddy...
Well, I suppose I can see how one could spend over $400 on themselves alone... It would require a very-very inefficient budget spending though. Like buying lunch boxes, expensive seafood, etc.
So you have zero transportation costs and are financially incapable of living independently.
http://livingwage.mit.edu/counties/18141
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Hmm? I had a bike, which is more than enough, given that I lived quite close to the campus, and there were lots of all kinds of shops nearby.
I spend more now; like I said, my total monthly spendings are around $1,100 or so. I live quite luxuriously by my standards, though, and I can't imagine what could make me spend more. Until I start needing the car badly (unlikely in the next 4 years), or get some really expensive hobby, or move to a much more expensive city, or get engaged with my partner moving in with me and not having any income - I can't see why I would ever spend more than that.
I only make $1460/mo and I have about $600 extra PER MONTH that I can spend on anything I want, and a lot of people here say that since my yearly income is so low (25,000-30,000~ yearly, depending on overtime) that I make shit money. I pay $425/mo for rent, water is paid for, and gas and electric are under $100/mo combined. Why on earth am I poor? People in certain parts of CA making three times as much as me have less money per month than I do.
Is wealth determined by how much you make, or how much wealth you can accumulate? I always assumed it was the latter.