Please do note
without heavy overdrive artifacts and I'm not talking paper spec, I'm talking actual performance. Overdrive artifacts can be and generally are considered worse than the pixel transition blur. Just cause one G2G transition can be low doesn't mean the average for the entire spectrum.
To give you an idea for IPS.
http://www.prad.de/new/monitore/test...tionsverhalten
This is what PG279Q looks like to achieve 4ms (3.8 for prad, 4.0 for tft's) average G2G and it has one of the fastest pixel transition for an IPS-type. The overshoot literally went off the charts. TFT central noted it at 178% overshoot on one transition just to achieve that.
In terms of the 2nd picture it wants to adhere as close to the line thing as possible.
Otherwise typical IPS is like this.
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2417h.htm
As for TN, let's take this which also has a decently fast TN panel.
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_s2716dg.htm
The average is 3.1ms with moderate overshoot.
Paper specs are useless.
- - - Updated - - -
So I thought this'd be fun exercise, which one is IPS-type, which one is TN.