I've had this MMOC account for a year. I'm sorry, I don't post seven times a day like you do. Somehow, this makes me a "smurf troll". I'm not trolling you. Your grammar is terrible (and excessive) and you write like you never finished high school. I was completely honest about that; is it really trolling when someone with a superiority complex argues, but has problems forming a coherent sentence and I point this out? Your behaviour is repulsive. What you have to say is not worth listening to with an attitude like that.
I see no reason to argue with someone like you. Nothing intelligent or good comes from that situation.
I also said I partially apologize, there's a difference. I'm not sure what excuse I made either...???
Anyway, good luck to you sir and I hope you have a change in your demeanour, as it seriously needs some adjustment.
Pictures or it didn't happen. C'mon, i bet bunch of people from Vancouver visit mmo-c. Help the cause!
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
Only when one intentionally draws attention to them or in an erotic setting. I had a meeting in Munich this weekend and let me tell you there are topless women everywhere (it's the weather) in the parks and nobody cares. Why would you? It is not like they are some mysterious body part you only ever get a glimpse of if you are lucky. They are quite a common sight almost nobody pays attention to.
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe they feel self-conscious when they see other, younge women's breasts?
Generally when organizing an event or going to one, there are 3 ways to get guests to do something. If you "ask" them to do it, it's optional. If you "encourage" them to do it, it is strongly desired but not required. If you "require" them to do it then yes, they must do it.
So they're asking men to wear bras, bikinis or pasties. So you can still go to this as a topless guy if you want with nothing on. Such oppression. Men are the most oppressed things on the planet, even more than dairy cows!
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
I got to visit a College campus for the first time in my life today and I have seen the truth. Women need to be empowered and I am glad that Vancouver is taking steps towards the liberation of the bewbs.
Except that Ghandi was pro-2nd amendent. Educate yourself, cur!
That has nothing to do with breasts being desexualized. It's about sexuality not being such taboo. There's a difference.
Obviously you gotta be attracted to the rest of the woman as well, it's not the breasts alone.
Oh, and I'm all for women running around topless. It'll keep me potent throughout the day.
I'm all for "freeing the nipple". Just don't expect men to not gawk at a hot woman's tits if she feels like exposing them. Tits are a sexual body part in Western culture. You can hate that all you want, but it's a fact of life that tits turn men on. And there's not really a fucking thing you can do about it.
In a slightly related note, I remember reading this one ultra-feminist's blog about how she had done everything she could to raise her kids as gender-neutral as possible and at the end of the day, her son still ended up pretending his toys (I forget what they were but they were some stupid gender-neutral shit and nothing warlike) were guns and ran around pretending to shoot and blow things up, and her daughter ended up trying to dress up her toys and play mommy to them and how pissed off the feminist was about it.
I'd go topless during heatwaves if it was more (not completely) socially acceptable and legal. I wouldn't even mind men looking, but staring long times I would consider rude (but hey, if you decide to be rude then I can't stop you).
Well, to be fair, long, obvious staring is considered rude no matter what. I think there's a difference between knowing people are taking multiple looks and glimpses of you, and seeing some asshole just openly staring directly at you. There's a polite way to "look" at someone and an impolite way. The problem is, there are feminists who seem to think that any looking at all, no matter what, is an offensive thing. I mean....it's human nature people. If something is pleasing to the eye, you're going to want to look at it and no matter what you probably are going to look at it, if only discreetly.
Last event like that in Montreal was nice. The only person taking offense was some old people booing and A few muslims and jews running away (was kinda hilarious). Im guessing the vancouver nipple day will be about the same, thought their immigration is mostly Asian, so less running away and eye covering lmao.
No? I was a bit young when I lived there but I'm sure nobody really cared all that much when a nipple was visible somewhere, but I must admit parks were a rarity around Mons compared to Germany. Almost everything was private property, thus no public places to sunbathe or go swimming out in nature.
my dick says otherwise
it might not be necessary for procreation, but neither is the female orgasm
breasts are definitely sexual, just like the ass
just because it's not used for procreation doesn't mean it doesn't arouse people
should people be allowed to pull down their pants and spread their buttcheeks and aim their butthole at people, too?
hey, it's not a sexual organ
stop anus-shaming me
Ah! the struggle of modern attention who.... oh sorry feminists.
You think it is intended to come across as sexual when you see women nursing, sunbathing, swimming, or sitting in the (mixed) sauna?
There is nothing more inherently sexual about a female nipple than a male one if you do not direct special attention to it and it is not in an erotic setting.
- - - Updated - - -
That is a cultural thing.
Angry feminist women desperate for attention trying to shock the world by showing their breasts
Except no one cares
What you're saying is so backwards.
On the one hand people complain when women are shown in s sexual way or certain features of them are highlighted.
"They are being objectified."
When the same is done to men, like Batman wearing a tight suit, that's not sexism at all.
However if women are "told to cover up", it is sexism too, and the example of Batman now can serve as an example of how men are allowed to wear something that women are not.
Pick one.
Either showing some female nipples is sexist or covering them up is. But not both at the same time.
- - - Updated - - -
No, it's a biological thing. We weren't taught to get a boner, it just happens.