I think porn is definitely bad for society.
It sets the expectations too damn high for women that just want to lay there like a dead fish.
I think porn is definitely bad for society.
It sets the expectations too damn high for women that just want to lay there like a dead fish.
Her cleavage is a public hazard.
Time...line? Time isn't made out of lines. It is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round. ~ Caboose
hard, concrete evidence to support this I see. "porn is for losers!", welp, I don't know about ya'll but I'm sure convinced!
A literal and proverbial whore teaming up with someone who has an imaginary friend. This isn't boding well from the get-go.The actress and model teamed up with Rabbi Shmuley Boteach - an author, host and TV speaker - to write for the Wall Street Journal about the dangers of pornography.
If the wife isn't putting out, it's either porn or a mistress. There's no logical reason to stay in an intimate relationship that doesn't provide adequate intimacy. Porn, at least, bridges that gap. The rest of that "as a father" bit is unfounded garbage.They argue it has a "corrosive effect on a man's soul and on his ability to function as husband, and, by extension, as father".
Alternatively, "An efficient option that provides a convenient outlet without hassle of dealing with a bat-shit crazy partner."In the article - entitled Take the Pledge: No More Indulging Porn - they urge readers to "understand that porn is for losers - a boring, wasteful and dead-end outlet for people too lazy to reap the ample rewards of healthy sexuality".
Seems like she's scared women are losing their "power". The availability of porn balances the scales of sexuality because it detaches the dependencies of monogamy and relationships. This works both ways and is a good thing.
More archaic and inane drivel from nobodies."A healthy, loving sexual experience demands both intimacy and respect, both of which pornography addiction destroys."
To be fair, someone like her is useless when she's not naked.
It also makes men aware that there's more to it just them just laying there like a dead fish.
Crazy bitches that get implants are more of a public hazard than porn.
Last edited by Mistame; 2016-09-03 at 03:40 PM.
So, wait. Are we supposed to pry into people's sexual life or not? Because this sounds like prying.
This coming from that woman who readily used her purchased breasts as her resume and best sales pitch?
As neither a husband nor a father I am glad that I get to wank away with total disregard for society. When I'm choking the life out of the purple monster I'll be sure to spare a thought for the many women I am disappointing.
Mentally sane adult people do not feel a desire to watch other people having sex. Banning it will only contribute to the healthy society.
i consider public figures who say stupid statements to be a public hazard.
r.i.p. alleria. 1997-2017. blizzard ruined alleria forever. blizz assassinated alleria's character and appearance.
i will never forgive you for this blizzard.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
There is a valid argument to be had concerning the ubiquity of pornography and it's effect of people's expectations in sex. Sure. However, as soon as that argument includes nonsense like "the soul", it is immediately dashed.
Foolish.
Random religious garbage.
There is neither a soul nor has porn a "corrupting" effect on it.
We can talk about what the internet in general does to people's social lives, and we can talk about too much of a normal thing or even how porn serves to raise unrealistic expectations and paints an unhealthy picture of what real sex is like.
But this? They can take their religious garbage and shove it where the sun doesn't shine.
For many men arguably these giant and so very obviously fake titties are anything but a turn on.
Last edited by Magicpot; 2016-09-03 at 01:27 PM.
Ignore the religious nonsense
Anyway, TLDR: after a lifetime of being prized for her sex appeal, she's old and undesirable and now resents younger women (including porn stars) for being able to excite men the way she wishes she still could
It doesn't matter if the drug pusher stopped selling drugs. He still became a billionaire selling the stuff, and now he's preaching against it. AFTER he reaped the benefits from the industry. not before.
People who benefit from X, have no right to chastise X or tell others not to consume X.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes!!!! this right here.
She feels the industry is "dirty" but she has no problem keeping all the wealth, and all the fame she reaped from it. If she seriously wanted to make a point she should have donated all her fortune to charity or some shit, because it was "ill-obtained money", but nope, all the money she got from a lifetime of porno = Good. Said porno = bad.
She is a hypocrite.
Por que odiar si amar es mas dulce? (*^_^*)
Mentally sane people do not feel the need to impose archaic and arbitrary "moral" onto others.
I realize the context of this comment may be from her perspective but it implies that she's among the best, which wasn't even true in her prime. I've always though she was nasty and irrelevant.
Yep. Implants, aside from being a neon sigh flashing "BATSHIT" are pretty horrible.
I actually had to look that up, you kids and your acronyms. Small breasts are so much better, shape withstanding.
Last edited by Mistame; 2016-09-03 at 03:54 PM.