I think this will become a law one day, and sooner than later. I think it's time people have the shit they type in forums be associated with their real names. Free speech is there, it is just that you are accountable now. Thoughts?
I think this will become a law one day, and sooner than later. I think it's time people have the shit they type in forums be associated with their real names. Free speech is there, it is just that you are accountable now. Thoughts?
** When you realize the person you're talking to is so clueless that they think you're the idiot **
we should also have access to people's blood types and whether or not they're organ donors too.
Kom graun, oso na graun op. Kom folau, oso na gyon op.
#IStandWithGinaCarano
No thanks, I enjoy not mixing my hobbies and professional life.
What you want != "What's going to be law"
People are already accountable. If a position of authority really wants you they can trace your IP Address. Normal people don't need that kind of information.
I really doubt it. Also, free speech doesn't exist on private boards and membership forums, and a real name requirement probably wouldn't stop a lot of trolls anyway, they'd just up their game.
People already treat Facebook like this so there will be a crowd for people that don't care who sees what they have to say. Personally I'll never use a forum that doesn't let me be anonymous.
We cant even manage to verify the legal status of voters.
How could this possibly work?
Besides the government already knows who we all are and they're adding us to the appropriate lists based off what we say.
MAGA
When all you do is WIN WIN WIN
I tend to think that might be the end result, yes. The amount of hostility and toxicity we are observing on the modern web would very likely be highly reduced by the accountability of acting under your real name, and not a pseudonym.
That being said, it's a sad development. The beauty of the net and your anonymity is that you can leave parts of yourself behind, parts that you'd rather not bring into a particular context. It means that a mother of five, a lawyer and a burger flipper can discuss anything, from social policy to whether Han shot first or not, without prejudiced biases based solely on their identity. Losing that is almost as bad as allowing toxic behaviour to run rampant.
It's a very hard problem to solve. Actually, I don't think it can be solved at all. :-/
I agree, it probably will be a thing...
...when North Korea gets public Internet access.
Sure it is, grandpa.
You're getting exactly what you deserve.