Considering the Horde races show an absolute ignorance of the concept of contrition, apology, or making things right, I am unsure why Horde Fanboys are expecting the Alliance to be this benevolent forgiving force.
The Horde as written seems to be filled with people to socially inept to understand how an apology or act of contrition is done. Orc's are painfully ignorant of their own History and I guess Forsaken are borderline completely unaware of their own existence or that most of them were once Human.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
Thrall settled Orcs in a desert as atonement for Old Horde's actions. Here's your contrition. And Forsaken are aware of being humans just fine, what of it? Also, considering that all major conflicts in WoW (either over nonsense or simply nothing) and most of the minor ones were started by the Alliance, you're aiming this at the wrong faction.
Sorry for the late reply (shipped off to visit family over the weekend).
First off, if we want to play the blame game, then does that mean that the Blood Elves have a right to declare vendetta against the collective alliance forces of the Eastern Kingdoms because they A: effectively abandoned them in the face of the scourge, resulting in the near destruction of their homeland, and B: were "effectively" responsible for the near total destruction of most of their military forces, as Garithos was still considered an "Alliance" military command figure when he attempted to first use them as cannon fodder, and then tried to have them imprisoned and executed?
Hell, if Genn is justified in hating Sylvanas for the death of his son purely due to cause and effect, rather then intent, then Sylvanas should be equally justified in hating every member of the alliance on the eastern kingdoms, since they are pretty much directly responsible for the fact that she eventually had her soul ripped out of her body by an alliance hero turned psycho murderous cult champion. If the alliance had just fought the scourge instead of abandoning Lordaeron to its fate, none of this would have happened.
Second, I hate to point this out to you, but argueably the only innocent who died in Theramore bombing was Rhonin. Everyone in the city when the bomb was dropped was a combatant, and was there almost expressly because Jaina had requested their assistance in defending her city. And it wasn't like Garrosh just threw the bomb at them with absolutely no warning or anything. He pretty much announced his intentions well in advance to anyone who would listen, and actually seiged the city for an extended period of time, sacrificing a fair number of Tauren and Trolls in what the other horde leaders were unaware was pretty much a diversionary action to ensure that there would be maximum effect against the alliance military when he finally unleashed his secret weapon on Theramore.
There is so much flat out wrong here it boggles my mind. Jaina didn't attempt to "do the same thing the Horde did to Theramore". Garrosh gave them AMPLE time, and plenty of indication that the attack was coming, and only bombed the city after practically ensuring that the only people that would be left in it were military combatants. There were no civilians killed in the Theramore attack, as they were all evacuated well before shit went down. Jaina's response? Attempt to use the exact same weapon to wipe every man, woman and child in Orgrimmar (as well as most likely the combined Horde AND Alliance fleets) off the map using a tidal wave of enslaved water elementals, without a care in the world if the victims were combatants or not, or even involved or not.The conclusion and what happened is that Jaina didn't do to Orgrimmar what the Horde did to Theramore, even though she had the opportunity and even though thousands upon thousands were killed not long before that. It is also a fact that it was the Horde that was the first one to kill an extremely large number of civilians yet again, while she decided not to give a proportionate answer in return.
If Jaina had attacked Orgrimmar as a military target, in the same manner as Garrosh attacked Theramore, then yes, I would applaud it as a smart strategic move. Instead, her attempted reprisal would have been the equivilent of Garrosh smuggling the bomb into Theramore on just any random day, and just flat out setting it off without any warning.
It would be like Your brother and My brother having a duel the death, and then you getting pissy because My brother brought a better weapon to the fight and won, so your response is to murder my entire family.
- - - Updated - - -
Which war exactly did the Forsaken start? If you are talking about the Gilneas conflict, yes, they did start that one. Mainly because their Warchief commanded them to secure a port, and after the cataclysm brought down the wall, Gilneas was the closest one available.
If you are talking about the general conflicts in the Lordaeron area, then I hate to break it to you, but the Alliance started most of that shit. Most of the conflicts in that regards come down the the Forsaken (who are 95% comprised of actual Lordaeron citizens) defending lands that they have legitimate claim to from people who are trying to take those lands from them, simply because the other people refuse to recognize them as legitimate "persons" and instead regard them as unholy monsters.
Last edited by Surfd; 2016-09-20 at 01:37 AM.