No, it just doesn't work as you think it does. The in group can be anyone that people identify with, it can be people who share your ideology and the out group are people who do not share your ideology. It can be the cultural group you belong to and the out group would be those who do not belong to it. It's not about being non-swedish.
It basically boils down to being different. Red VS Blue.
Last edited by mmoc1afe70b5e4; 2016-10-03 at 01:24 PM.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
And your point is? Seems kinda random you brought them up.. unless youre suggesting that the far right is secretly bringing more refugees into the west or some such.
Oh waaaait, I get it now, I forgot you're a leftist and therefor unable to grasp the concept of individuality. Obviously to you its "if youre not with the program, youre part of the far right" or some such.
As our crimestatstic bureau (BRÅ) havent released figures of Swedes vs non-swedes crimerates since 2005 which is really before this open door policy escalated it makes you wonder what the statstics would be today as it was 250% higher risk that a an Immigrant commited a crime then an ethnic swede back in 05.
As someone already stated it makes me sick being fed all this government propaganda about how good and strenghten diversity is. I've yet with the exception of food yet to see any positive change to my way of life.
I really dont understand this perverse idea that we should bring hostile cultures into our own because it will unite and strenghten us, when has that ever proven to be succesful? It sounds more like the way Roman empire fell (go look it up) With Huns and Barbarians coming to live in the glorius Rome what was the outcome? Civilwar and the complete destruction of the Western Empire.
I was recently in Munich and experiensed the Oktoberfest (had a blast) really amazing to witeness those Germans in lederhousen, why cant we just keep our inheritage and culture go, travel and experiense the other cultures of the world, whats the point in hopping them all together in once place? All it leads to as it has before in our History to despair and war.
Last edited by mmoc489118fe45; 2016-10-03 at 03:03 PM.
Well seeing all gang executions lately it's all immigrant gangs fighting eachother in malmö, göteborg and stockholm with all the suburbs that goes with it.
Cant remember even one case where it's a native swede getting killed or killing someone in these gang wars we have had now for years, then again the cops almost never catch them either so hard to say lol, but if you have any idea what gangs are fighting eachother it's clear as day who is involved. Well they did catch the guys shooting up a resturant in göteborg, it was all somalis.
Screw that noise. Diversity means less Swedish women, and you know what that means? Means more ugly people. Specifically, less Swedish women. We can't have that, no sir.
Also, the only time immigration was a good thing for a country is when you're freaking rich and own a business and don't want to pay the wages that the locals usually want. Know what I say to that? Robots!
There is a difference here. The policy of multiculturalism is directed towards legal, conventional immigrants. The way they handled refugee crisis isn't really a part of that: refugees weren't taken in for the sake of diversity, they were taken in because it is a part of Western mentality, which is valuing human lives.
That said, diversity is a good thing. Sure, it brings in a lot of problems with it as well; but ultimately, if you look at the world, the most advanced and developed countries tend to be the ones with the highest diversity: the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, France, Germany, Sweden... There are some exceptions, like Japan - but even Japan is now changing its immigration system to allow more foreigners in, because their monocultural system is stagnating.
You can both maintain your traditions, and interact with other cultures. As long as the immigrants you are taking in are assimilated well, there will be very little problem. And lack of proper assimilation mechanisms in European countries is the real problem, not multiculturalism itself. When the asylum seekers are just given welfare, they have very little incentive to put in effort and get integrated in society. I think the US handles it much better: you will be getting some help temporarily, if you are seeking asylum - but eventually you will either have to find a job (for which you typically need to speak English, at least), or die off starvation, or go back to where you came from. It is a more pragmatic approach, I think.
If affluent folks choose some market over another, and they are willing to pay more for the product, that increases prices. If the housing market offers a wider choice than the renting one -as it does when the availability of one is strictly paced- they'll choose to buy instead of renting, asymmetrically increasing the value of the buildings.
Tight control of the rent market easily -though not necessarily- hikes up the prices of new buildings.
Furthermore, such regulation is prone to some segregation: newcomer migrants, are more pressured to find a decent place, yet they've spent very little time gaining points (that affects young people as well), so they end up with less of an actual choice living in the less than optimal places (probably the outskirts, or in a rural setting).
But, let me guess: that point system is in place to make renting equally affordable for all. It's probably loved by the socialists, and contested by the liberals.
It is exactly what we were discussing before: that is a regulation in place to ensure social equality, yet it slugs the housing market.
If you're looking into deregulating anything, that is probably the greatest offender. I'd guess much more than a 20m2 living-room or decent sound insulation standards.
I mean, you guys are free to do whatever. It is, as we agreed, a balancing act. I'm not suggesting that you must deregulate it, but it is a lever like any other: if we want to absorb the increasing amount of people migrating to urban centers, we'll have to give up a bit of social mobility, equality, welfare, and all those things we love.
I'm still not sure if you are a total brain dead, or just trolling. It's pretty hard to get the difference thos days...
Just watch that and tell me how well it worked : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFckEyyLfTg
Infracted
Last edited by Darsithis; 2016-10-05 at 12:52 AM.