Again, look at what I said. 40 hours isn't bad. 40 hours just to survive is bad. Huge difference really. So I am curious, if 40 hours a week is "absolutely terrible", what is acceptable to you? 20 hours a week? Anything other than Tue-Thurs, 9-3 isn't just slave labor?
it's because we are a country founded by puritans, and if you dont have a bead of sweat dripping off your nose then apparently you're not doing your job well...it's not that we suck (which is a nice blanket statement by the way, good job), but it is rather inefficient. some jobs do just require hours to produce something, and in those cases throwing hours at it just means more production.
What frustrates me about my job is that i work 45-50 hrs a week on salary, i can do my job in 20-30hrs spread through the week, but the owner of the company wants me here 40hrs a week 8am to 5pm monday through friday. I really dont need to work the number of hours a week but he doesnt see the world that way. plus he expects that i should be working past 5pm every day since im salary, which i try not to do because i dont need to. all my projects get completed ahead of schedule and under budget. I also run the design/engineering department. /shrug i need to start my own business...
Last edited by Ornerybear; 2016-10-20 at 06:22 PM.
Working 7 hours and 24 minutes pr. day and that includes a 30 min lunch break.
Got flexible hours. I can safe up time (up to 60 hours) and spend them as a like. I can work 9 hours one day and go home early the next.
Last edited by mmoca0c62387e3; 2016-10-20 at 06:33 PM.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
If you have a shitty job, sure. Anyone with a half way decent job will do just fine with 40 hours/week.
Raising wages for shitty jobs wouldn't help. Stuff would just end up costing more. If you have a pleb job, expect pleb wages. If you want to be better off then it's up to you to make yourself better off, not the government.
That being said, minimum wage should be adjusted over time but only enough to keep up with inflation. No more and no less.
Last edited by Docturphil; 2016-10-20 at 06:36 PM.
"Next to no workers rights"? Clearly a credible statement.
That's not exactly how it works. There are obviously invalid reasons (discrimination, etc). But an employer should be able to run their business how they want and if they feel an employee isn't working out or that they need to downsize, etc, that should be within their rights.
In the US, unions are arbiters of sorts between employees and employers that help to reach mutual agreements on terms of employment. Unions don't and can't force either side to do anything as either side can refuse the terms of a negotiation, if they feel those terms are unfair. And they charge the employees for this "service".
This is mostly hyperbole. Workers have rights. But so do employers.
I work 40 hours a week and get 24 paid vacation days. I only get 24 paid vacation days which is minimal, because I don't have any children, any medical difficulties, etc.
you couldnt have hit the nail on the head any better. He gets mad when people take vacation or need to take personal time to leave work early for an appointment or family business. god forbid you call in sick, he assumes youre lying. I take 1 sick day a year usually, maybe 1 personal day worth of time, but i always use my 2 weeks of vacation. i've been here 5 years and i still only have 10 days of vacation. he doesnt give you an extra week until 10 years. i should also mention that when the shop guys started being late and slipping out early all the time he installed a fingerprint time clock, but he makes us salary employees use it as well.
Last edited by Ornerybear; 2016-10-20 at 06:54 PM.
And if they "refuse"... it's over? Strikes? Why won't they tell them to stop working and add pressure? (will you get fired in the US for that?)In the US, unions are arbiters of sorts between employees and employers that help to reach mutual agreements on terms of employment. Unions don't and can't force either side to do anything as either side can refuse the terms of a negotiation, if they feel those terms are unfair. And they charge the employees for this "service".
They are supposed to stop your employer from making a mint, while you slave your way into depression/death/illness without getting the pay you "deserve". Of course, the employer can say "no", but it's not like it's over after just that. They set standards, proof if your company can make a profit while providing these standards, and then they'll push for it.
It's also worth mentioning that not like only the employees get something out of unions btw.
Last edited by mmoc96d9238e4b; 2016-10-20 at 07:07 PM.
I think that has more to do with the culture you're raised in than actually having or not having wealth.
Wealthy people in America typically work harder. They usually work harder because they were raised to work harder. If you work harder you have more wealth.
On the other hand you have poor people. Poor people are poor because they're lazy. They're lazy because they were raised by lazy people.
This seems to be apparent with education as well. More educated people tend to have more educated children. Less educated people tend to have less educated children.
There are exceptions to this of course. Plenty of people who break the cycle for better or worse, but I think in general this is true.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
I love how its apparently something to mock that Europeans have more free time than Americans.
No, you idiots. Thats not something to mock, thats something to be angry about.
Having less freedom than someone else but the same (or much worse in case of healthcare) outcome is sad for a first world country.
Most employees that would be affected by the minimum wage increase only work on average 32-35 hours. The wage increase wouldn't affect the majority of individuals the article is describing, which are putting in over 40+ hours to pay off ridiculous student loans so that they could start a career that would later seem stupid because they could have just complained and did half the work.