This whole anti-establishment stuff is a load of bullshit both in the US and the UK with Brexit.
Plenty of outsiders to pick from in every election and no one really votes for them. Suddenly everyone backs two right wing demagogues who denigrate minorities and women and we're supposed to believe its all because people don't like the establishment?
That both Trump and Farage are part of what is traditionally seen as the establishment just makes the whole thing laughable.
Silver lining though, Farage seems to have given up on the UK (Thank fuck) and will hopefully spend the rest of his career wedged firmly up that Tango faced moron's arse.
I agree with this. The PC crowd are really just bullies IMO. I live in California and while I didn't like Trump if I even suggested that I wasn't voting for Hillary I know attitudes towards me would change and not for the better. I wouldn't say I was scared to voice my opinion but I didn't mention anything because I didn't want to complicate things at work.
The internet is to blame. It pushed the big news corporations into chasing clicks which in turn mean they only write about sensationalist stuff good/bad. That or it's "how to lose 20 kilos in just two weeks". It's a shame really, when i was younger i always wanted to become a journalist.
I think it's completely illogical to assume people got out in numbers like that just so they could say, as you're suggesting, some "off color" things. You're trying to frame this as a fault of the Trump supporters when it's really the left who decided they wanted to take every little thing to an extreme level. If you look at exit polling, most people agreed some of his comments weren't tasteful, but they cared far more about putting food on the table for their children and making sure everyone still had a fair shot at the american dream.
This is totally the lefts fault and all of us on this side of the table need to take responsibility for it. Going forward we can't just stay silent when the extremes in our party call everything sexist, mysogynist, etc when we know it's important for that language to remain for circumstance it's warranted or we run the risk of desensitization.
All you need to do is look no further than the left ad campaigns for Hillary essentially drawing comparisons to some of the darkest fascists relevant to Trump. Commercials that had so many celebrities making this campaign a "crusade against evil". Most centrist people think this is absurd and they are right.
You act as if I was unaware that people thought the idea was bad. You act as if I am not one of them. You act as if the article said something new and relevant to me. You act as if I didn't read it. Why? Why do you say these things? Why does it matter to you, that I say I agree or disagree with your article?
The capital glut, that causes the bubbles is usually short term.
That is why usually the bubbles are in high liquidity assets. A bubble in currency trade, or real estate, or stock market trade is usually more probable than an industrial production bubble.
It's quite hard to imagine speculative capital to suddenly be interested to invest into creating a production, that yields slow and long investment return, and requires more of your attention than flipping stocks to make money out of money.
In a situation when there is no growing demand, or the demand is actually shrinking tax reduction is one of the ways to increase the competitiveness of a domestic production. Difference in wages has a different impact on different kinds of productions. If we again take the automotive industry as a reference - we have the production of automotive wires, that is almost all low-skill labor, actual people taping together the wires, putting connectors on them etc. 80% of the work is done by hand. And thus the cost of the final product is very labor intensive. And you have the stamping, which is usually done by an automated press line, that is operated by robots. In this case the direct labor costs are a much lesser portion of the final product than in wires.
Not all productions require a lot of cheap unskilled labor. Not all products are very labor intensive. For those products it is possible to compensate the difference in labor costs with some additional benefits like tax reductions, government support, or protective measures like import taxes or import quotas. US in this case is at an advantage, since people are very interested in the access to the US internal market, since the amount of consumers is quite high, the wealth of those consumers is also substantial and it gives the US government more options than smaller or poorer countries have.
I am not saying that it is easy, nor am I saying that you can bring back all the call centers from India or all the textile jobs from Mexico, but it is potentially viable to create some jobs and bring back some other.
Another potential option for at least temporary job increase is govrenment sponsored infrastructure projects.
Of course all of that is a matter of discussion and big calculations, but still there are options.
The penis thing was a joke, unfortunately I'm kind of middling, I guess jokes go way over your head.
- - - Updated - - -
Latinos voting for trump just feels like Jews voting for Hitler, and yes I know I godwinned and hyperboled, but come on, the guy linked them with rapists.
I think you are missing some nuance here. It's not just "off color" things that got rolled up in to the PC crusade. It's a lot of things, and many of them are widely held beliefs. The American Left has been beating this drum of ideas that must be considered truths for quite some time, and not just on issues of race and equality. Sure, the media and their pundits can broadcast that up is down all night long, and on the surface it works. But, don't be all shocked when the public, who clearly disagreed, votes differently.
I think the Trump win is about two things:
1. Fuck you Washington
2. No really, fuck you Washington.