The precedence has been set. No experience needed. No fact checking needed. Over whelming outrage is however needed. We'll see what happens in 2020 but I'm going to do everything in my power to help.
And this topic was politics from the start when the victim complex came out from the right because their neo nazi supporters got banned from Twitter.
Can't wait till Jan 20th when we begin to start dismantling everything you socialist have accomplished. There can't be more of a fuck you and a big middle finger to your ideology then that.
- - - Updated - - -
No. Just the truth. Something you know how to twist and bend. It's all I ever see the left does. Take the CNN lady who gave Clinton some of the questions to the 2nd debate.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah, but that's different. I loathe the left, but Trumps about to really shit in their wheaties so it's all good.
As I said before we haven't seen democrats this mad since the Republicans took away their slaves.
This times 100.
If the left disagrees with the right, it must be because the right is racist or bigoted or sexist, etc.
The right simply looks at the left and goes - "man I feel sorry for those folks". They do this because they know they are dealing with mostly an uneducated group.
WTF
you cant be serious. can you? you got to be joking or are you baiting hoping I will flame you for not knowing what knowingly and willfully means
it means they knew what they was doing when they wrote the tweet threating Trump and they did it willingly no one forced them
I have no fucking idea what you thought it meant
Last edited by Vyxn; 2016-11-17 at 01:04 AM.
So you see a disabled person in a Ferrari and you smash your knees with a hammer...great idea.
Alternatively, don't deliberately handicap yourself. Or do. Your choice.
Are these people actual neo-Nazis? Because that gets thrown around so much that it has lost any real meaning.And this topic was politics from the start when the victim complex came out from the right because their neo nazi supporters got banned from Twitter.
Plus the article in the OP is from the Guardian, who have gone into meltdown and are currently accusing everyone of being neo-Nazis, misogynists and whatever other things they can find in their "Little Book of Buzzwords", whilst they sip on their decaf latte and nibble on an organic digestive in a cafe in Islington.
Last edited by Kalis; 2016-11-17 at 01:04 AM.
This is untrue, the right has a larger percentage of voters that lack a college education. Facts do not cease to exist just because they contradict your perception. It is somewhat similar to individuals who claim that Trump won the popular vote, when he in fact lost it.
"It ain't ignorance causes so much trouble; it's folks knowing so much that ain't so." -Josh Billings
Good. I'm fine with people who spew hate speech being banned.
Regardless of freedom of speech you have to consider that if you allow it then it can potentially bring a bad light on your company, or service, or business because you keep allowing it to occur. Nobody wants bad rep because people start realizing your service is being used as a commonplace vehicle for hate speech, all for the sake of maintaining "freedom of speech".
Giving them time to prepare for every question ruins the point of that debate. Overreacting is what my party has been doing with all the crying and rioting... No, this is a valid point. You would probably agree with us on this, if it were the opposite party being accused.
It's funny how these discussions always devolve into people thinking these assholes were banned because they were right wing, when in reality it was because they were assholes. You can argue all day and night that political affiliation needs to be a protected class. Even if it were a protected class, spouting racist, bigoted and homophobic statements is being an asshole, not being right wing, and why people are banned.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"