Pretty much all Presidents do this to a degree. The problem is this misconception people have about the President, which incorrectly is that he's all-ruling king and can implement any policy or law he wants (executive order jokes aside). So when they are running every candidate makes all kinds of declarations and promises about doing this policy and that policy, etc. to get votes.
But then after they win reality sets in that we intentionally setup our government to not be a monarchy like England, and the President's powers are far more limited than most people think. Republicans controlling Congress definitely helps, but especially for some of Trump's more radical ideas I guarantee that some will cross-over to the Demo side if they fear voter reprisal from their constituency. It won't be a rubber stamp for sure. And the Republican majority is pretty thin to where it won't take much to break it.
So his realization of that is why a lot of things are being toned down. He's smart enough to know that if he wants to get anything done he's going to have to soften his tone a bit. That's not unique to Trump though, if you go back and look at campaigns from all the past Presidents they all make more extreme promises than what they can actually deliver.
The reason that it's entirely disingenuous is because there's nothing in any of my posts that suggests that I have a problem with spirited disagreement. In fact, what I'm defending is people being able to disagree about issues without having ridiculous ad hominem attacks leveled at them.
If you think I'm arguing that "I disagree with you" or "I think that's wrong" is what constitutes being an unreasonable scold, I'd appreciate you linking to the post that seems to imply this.
Calling you out on all your posts as a whole, starting from page 13. I am not going to link them all, but I am reading that you keep saying everyone is labeling bigot, this bigot that.
Its why I am telling you to stay of Tumblr. Tumblr is just for shit posting, and horrible fan fiction porn.
I called it a while ago. Trump is not a republican, he's an old democrat and he's making the big heads there rolling in a stupor because he's impossible to coin.
My hopes for a Trump presidency keep going up.
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..
I'm certainly comfortable that I wrote it coherently now that I've ascertained that you read something that's not there. I guess I must have explained this about a half-dozen times and the failure to comprehend it is on your end. That's fine. When you get stuck on something, you're strangely bad at doing anything other than repeating yourself.
I like how he is trolling all my (R) friends. I live in NY, and we are used to Trump, everyone I know who is (D) expected him to reverse nearly everything, if not everything. NY (R) from the city and island just cares about taxes and money.
- - - Updated - - -
I dont know where I could have gotten the idea you were saying "labeling people as bigot for disagreeing"I'm not upset about anything. What I'm saying people object to is the hypocrisy of labeling people that don't support gay marriage "bigots" when this was a position held by nearly all powerful Democrats only a few years ago. The idea that objective standards can shift that much in a few years is pretty obviously absurd. Changing positions is fine - changing positions and then saying that everyone who hasn't also changed is a bigot is ridiculous.
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..
This post immediately followed someone literally saying that all presidential candidates are stupid bigots.
But whatever, like I said, you're just not great at understanding anything that doesn't jibe with what you already believe. If you actually believe that the only place that anyone gets called a bigot is on Tumblr, you're deliberately ignorant.