People working 2 jobs in the US (at least one part-time) - 7.8 Million (Roughly 4.9% of the workforce)
People working 2 full-time jobs in the US - 360,000 (0.2% of the workforce)
Average time worked weekly by the US Workforce - 34.5 hours
So Russia is the bad guy for leaking ACTUAL emails from Clinton showing how big of a piece of shit she is? Hillary is not the piece of shit, but Russia is for showing it? Am I getting this straight?
If your gf cheated on you, would you like to know? Or would the person telling you be a huge piece of shit?
Not really. I'm quite aware of the level of doublethink most Republicans engage in these days.
Yeah just all the shit that defines us as civilized.And economically productive blues is what? Actors, artists and finance? They produced what amounts to shit and entertainment
People working 2 jobs in the US (at least one part-time) - 7.8 Million (Roughly 4.9% of the workforce)
People working 2 full-time jobs in the US - 360,000 (0.2% of the workforce)
Average time worked weekly by the US Workforce - 34.5 hours
People working 2 jobs in the US (at least one part-time) - 7.8 Million (Roughly 4.9% of the workforce)
People working 2 full-time jobs in the US - 360,000 (0.2% of the workforce)
Average time worked weekly by the US Workforce - 34.5 hours
Except the actual analogy would be:
A woman who wants to break you and your GF up sends you an email saying your current GF, who said this other guy looked good, was cheating on you, and somehow has a clip of your GF saying this, and taken entirely out of context.
Because once again Clinton didn't break any laws despite what you insane "Hillary is the illuminati hitler devil" people think.
I don't support Trump, but even if I did, the Washington Post is still not a credible news site. They, like many others, have provided false sensationalist media to the public before, and I take everything that I read now-a-days with a grain of salt. And, http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...tial-election/ will prove this to you.
So the article says that hackers with ties to Russia swayed the election result...
... by revealing the DNC and Hillary Clintons emails that depict them the way they actually are.
Seems to me that this CIA assessment is saying the people revealing corruption are in the wrong (because of ties to them ruskies), rather than the parties committing the corruption in the first place.
pretty sure there's something under title 18 about how one is expected to handle sensitive information. The utilization of a personal server to store information of a classified nature would be in violation of federal law. Such handling of information was how a number of individuals in the past have been locked up, or harassed due to non-classified information being made classified after individuals came into possession of certain documents.
As for other stories about the clintons... they aren't verifiable, regardless of the numerous suicide cases of individuals who were surprisingly accurate at single shot self inflicted wounds from behind.