And yet U.S. recognized American Indians' rights and tries to compensate more and more since late XX century.Oh and the US resident should pack up and leave for the American Indians who had complex societies there way before most of Northern Europe.
The point here... If ancient Egyptians would still exist in big enough numbers, they could probably present some of their historical claims and maybe get a certain level of support from U.N. or other countries. Perhaps getting an autonomy. So for Thracians and other tribes, if they would still exist.
Jews, however, did the impossible - survived as a nation despite all the perils they got through. And came back to claim a piece of the land they once lived in. So don't expect them to let someone take it from them once again.
Every tribe should have its own country or living spot on Earth. Arabs have - how many?? - 25? 30 countries? So why none of these countries, some of which have HUGE non-occupied spaces and a lot of potential place to live, didn't offer Palestinian Arabs a place? After all, they are exactly the same Arabic people.
Take Saudi Arabia, for example. Vast territory and a huge wealth coming from petroleum business. Why won't they let few thousand Palestinian Refugees in? I'll tell why - cause these refugees are too radical for even some Saudi Arabian sheikh tastes. They don't want the scum in, I understand. So they want us to have them instead? No thanks.
Jews, however, don't have a choice. There is no other Jewish land or country existing in the world.
Antisemite spotted!!1!
Occupied land isn't theirs. As the name "occupied" should tell you.
That's totes Sweden's stance and not your victim Olympics-driven paranoid fantasy.
Any day now.
If he's true to his word he'll quit the UN and these kind of motions won't have to face being vetoed by the US anymore.
Obviously that's a joke, the clue is the bit where I implied Trump might be true to any of his words.
- - - Updated - - -
I must've missed those Israeli settlements in Berlin.
You don't need it to be 10% to start wreaking havoc and let things like Maria Ladenburger's murder or yesterday's Berlin attack to happen.Sweden isn't even in top 3 of EU countries in terms of Muslim population. And the only one with more than 10% of the population being Muslim is in the fucking Balkans.
The facts speak for themselves. EVERY terrorist attack or murder NOWADAYS, in whole WORLD, is being performed by Radical Islamists. The murder of Russian ambassador in Turkey, for instance, was performed by man shouting "Allah Akbar" and so on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb8l1kJJii0
Allah Akbar as a phrase itself became the synonym of evil in modern world. I'm feeling sorry for all adequate Muslims, it isn't their fault of course, but their radical counterparts made it happen.
Finally, to all Israeli haters and so on.... Deal with radical Islam first. When things like this stop happening all over the world, then it will be the time to talk about instigating more Muslim countries and their rights. For now, nothing to talk about.
Given how Jews are the first people only in the Bible, they aren't the first people to settle there anyway. Millenia old "claims" have no validity anyway. If they did, Caucasus central Asia would be a ginormous legal clusterfuck.
And yet, contrary to your nation bashing crap, they are recognized world-wide.
Do link laws that make it illegal.
Yeah, Arab forefathers of Palestinians moved in the region only in 17th century. Right.
Wait till they start talking about Holodomor. That's comedy gold right there. Especially once you factor in the hypocrisy.
If you mentioned Holodomor, let's make some things clear.
There was a general famine in USSR in 1932-1933, there wasn't an artificially created famine to take down millions of Ukrainians as some modern Ukrainian politicians claim.
A lot of facts and data tell about the same level of famine going on in Russian regions as well.
In other words, Holodomor did happen, but it is a general result of so-called "collectivization", not some kind of "famine, specially directed to kill Ukrainians" (total nonsense).
People died because of a forced nationalization of their agricultural property. Died in ALL European Russian region.
Hmm, I don't see European nations other than Russia occupying foreign territory right now.
Not sure why you're putting "Palestinian refugees" in quotation marks (other than your nationalistic shit, I suppose), but Palestinian diaspora is a thing. And other than neighboring territories of Syria, Jordan and Egypt, most of Palestinians in diaspora live in Americas. Brooding ground of global terrorism right there, those Palestinians in goddamn Honduras.
Talking against Islamists, talking against Palestine, what's the difference lel.
We don't care. Wallstrom is a joke, and under her wise leadership Sweden is becoming a joke as well (unfortunately, as I had a lot of respect for that country in the past). There is nothing her lunatic self can do to change the status quo.
Unlike the Swedes we don't elect politicians that'll let their own country burn just to appease the hordes bent on their destruction. And no, even if the oh so hated on these forums Netanyahu loses the next elections, nothing will change either, as even our moderate left parties are reasonable people and will not change anything significant. We do have some delusional ultra lefties as well, but fortunately they are a tiny minority.
As for the settlements, I might not be a big supporter of them as I'd rather not have my tax shekels being spent on supporting them, but I realize all too well that removing them (and kicking 400,000 people out of their homes) will accomplish absolutely nothing towards achieving peace, the "Palestinians" will simply come up with another reason for hating/attacking Israel and the cycle with start anew. That's why most of the world's reasonable people in power (you know, the ones that get their info from sources other than propaganda sites) don't try to do anything about the settlement "problem", even if they criticize them for the PR purposes.
Never said all of them were inadequate. But I was actually talking about these radicalized ones - "refugee camps" in Syria, etc, are actually a kind of best recruitment places for ISIS, etc.And other than neighboring territories of Syria, Jordan and Egypt, most of Palestinians in diaspora live in Americas.
Those living in Americas are smart enough to never return to places like Gaza, I am quite sure of that.
So the next big question arises.. If Muslims themselves suffer from Islamic terror the most, why they aren't taking decisive measures against it?Ironically the people who suffered most from terrorists are muslims.
There are more than 30 Muslim countries in the world, with some of those having formidable military forces. With their military powers they could completely exterminate terrorists from existence.
However, most of them hardly interfere. Turkish military is ranked 9th strongest in the world (above IDF), but it hardly did any impact on ISIS. What is the reason?