http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a6773666.html
As long as the idea that Sharia Law is preached, Islam will still be looked down upon as Barbaric.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a6773666.html
As long as the idea that Sharia Law is preached, Islam will still be looked down upon as Barbaric.
Maybe because its incredibly difficult to gain official papers in some countries...or you know, it was fucking destroyed when the rest of their possessions were when their houses were levelled by a tank shell?
No, but if said man was a "Illegal African with links of Cologne" or "Preaches strict Sharia Laws" yes, I'd pretty much judge them as the kind to be rapists. HOWEVER, I would only see them punished if they rape someone.
See how that works. I judge them, but I don't punish them.
- - - Updated - - -
Then too bad, if they're rich enough to afford pampered iphones and to be "Highly Qualified peoples" then they should have their papers in order.
- - - Updated - - -
Please do some research, I'm sick of needing to browse google to find articles specifically from sites that can't be called fake news.
As it showed keeping out the agressive group of north africans helped a lot in preventing crimes. Nothing racist with this when its a fact.
Dont you think its pretty provocative to gather a group of multiple hundred north africans at the very place where the grabbening took place?
Or, on an alternative, they're selling or getting their passports stolen. But you never thought of that angle did you? https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...rian-passports
It's still misleading.
The US system packs asylum with resettlement.
Resettlement programs similar to that in the US exist. But up until recently only at a national level, and not every country has them. There's a few agreements at the EU level to settle some 22k people picked up and processed in third countries like Lebanon (just like the US does).
It's still tiny, but that's beyond the issue at hand: what people are trying to discuss is the emergency situation that has waves of people coming in, which needs a very different approach, and they're expected to eventually return. Not resettlement. The US system doesn't meet any standard whatsoever on that front.
You want to segregate refugees from the rest of migrants and that's fine. But we also need segregate asylum seeking from the resettlement process. The American experience of success is replicated here in the resettlement programs. The bulk of the issue with refugees today in Europe, however, is something the US system can't teach anything about. Your system works, but it's irrelevant.
Last edited by nextormento; 2017-01-02 at 11:03 AM.