Contrary to expectations, the report says nothing about the forensic analysis or American spying on which the conclusions are based.
Contrary to expectations, the report says nothing about the forensic analysis or American spying on which the conclusions are based.
I'm sure there's more, but I remember a certain email lamenting the fact a brown person was responsible for a mass shooting instead of a white guy, which would have been much more convenient for them in spreading their narrative about domestic terrorists(angry white males) being a bigger threat than foreign.
isn't it funny when hillary was thought to win, obama and co all said that the election is unhackable and unriggable, but now that trump wins, every msm is saying that russians hacked the election.
no ones saying russia hacked the election, people are using broad terms and or not actually reading the articles and knowing what the fuck happened. Russia released emails it was able to hack from the dems becuase the dems were doing shady and dirty shit. They hacked both parties but putin disliked clinton more so he released shit showing what a scumbag her party was. russia didnt hack any voting or poling machines.
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..
Russia will be our ally in the next war, just like they have been in every major conflict. This is a complete joke. Same shit in every election just this time around one side is crying as hard as they can and finding any reason to
The report if anyone is interested:
KEY FINDINGS
- Vladimir Putin ordered an campaign aimed at influencing the outcome of the 2016 election, with a preference for Donald Trump. Their main goals were to reduce faith in American democracy and harm the electability/potential presidency of Hillary Clinton. CIA, FBI, NSA express "high degree of confidence" in this fact.
- Putin and the Russian govt. aspired to help Trump when possible by discrediting Clinton and comparing her to him unfavorably. CIA and FBI have 'high' degree of confidence, NSA is moderately confident.
- The influence campaign evolved its tactics over time, such as changing the focus to undermining Hillary's future presidency when it was presumed she would win.
- Report is based off of information gathered both before and after November 8th.
- The influence campaign followed a strategy that blended covert activities - such as cyber attacks - with more overt efforts by the Russian govt., state-run media, third parties, and paid trolls on social media.
- The influence campaign used cyber attacks against entities and individual members of BOTH political parties.
- CIA, FBI, NSA have high degree of confidence that Russian military intelligence used the 'Guccifer 2.0' persona and DCLeaks website to release information illegally gained via these cyber attacks.
- Russian intelligence obtained and access to elements of multiple local and state electoral boards. DHS has confirmed that the systems compromised by the Russians WERE NOT involved in vote tallying.
- Russian state-run media contributed to the influence campaign by serving as their mouthpiece and disseminating propaganda from the Kremlin.
The report goes on to detail Russia's motivations for the attacks: to undermine US democracy, to "advance its long-standing agenda against the US-led liberal democratic order" that they believe is a threat to the Russian regime, they believe Trump would be favorable to an international counterterrorism coalition against ISIS, and Putin wanted payback against Clinton because he believes her criticism of him incited the protests in 2011 and 2012.
I mean surely there can be no doubt that undermining American democracy is one of the primary motives. How much clearer could they have made it than this:
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/21/po...tion-monitors/
Hahahahahahahaha!
Well, they did vote Trump into office. Experience suggests they'll believe just about anything if it looks cool enough. And this looks pretty damn cool. The document has coloured front page and all. That'll be enough to convince enough people, regardless of the lack of evidence and "we believe" in the document. :P
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
False. The CIA provided a report full of cautions and caveats which the Republicans removed to trump up a case for war.
This has been public for years but a fully non-expurgated version is now available for your reading pleasure.
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/he...15-3?r=US&IR=T