The release of manning is a phish to get assange to actually keep his word and give himself up. It's like obama is more concerned with getting the people who hacked the dnc then he is about a traitor who gave up national security and put people's lives in danger.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
I agree with you about Manning, I see no compelling reason to pardon him unless you conclude he was utterly insane and not responsible for his actions, and I don't think that was the case.
On the other hand if I recall correctly it was ruled his treatment for the first year was essentially torture which may have carried a lot of weight.
I was specifically referring to 2008-2009 Wall Street crash and I am not aware of anybody on Wall Street doing a single day of jail for that.
If you are familiar with wrongful death lawsuits then you know the government considers an american life to be worth around 1 million dollars. The great recession cost 13 trillion dollars. That is the equivalent of 13 million wrongful deaths and nobody did a day in jail.
That's the wrong way around, Manning leaked via Wikileaks. Snowden leaked to the US press.
I think what you mean is that Manning faced charges in the US, while Snowden fled.
- - - Updated - - -
I read this as sarcasm until I realised you were posting it.
Still hard to take it seriously.
The most apt (though older) comparison is Ellsberg and the Pentagon papers - the charges against him were dropped after a mistrial, and there was an important pro-freedom of speech Supreme Court ruling by the end of it. In looking back on what I wrote above, "overall" and "brutal" aren't completely fair to Obama to put together like that, though his treatment of leakers has many problems. The treatment of Manning in particular has been brutal and unprecedented - other leakers have tended to get slaps on the wrist and/or short sentences, not decades-long sentences with lots of time in solitary (that tends to be more reserved for actual spies - agents of foreign powers often acting for profit or the direct benefit of a foreign country, something Manning was explicitly not found guilty of); what is also unprecedented with the other "leakers" (who've been caught) under Obama is the sheer number of prosecutions - aside from Manning the one that stands out is Drake, who in the end avoided Manning-level jail treatment, but did have his life destroyed, even though he was arguably following the rules (and who in turn, was a massive lesson for Snowden, and likely is what caused him to choose "steal, dump, and flee" over "follow process to complain").
One similar case under Obama was the persecution (to the point of suicide) of hacktivist Aaron Schwartz by U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz, who never received any official reprimand for her actions.
It's difficult to find many more examples, because there was less leaking, or wasn't followed up on much with the Bush and Clinton administrations. One such might be Sandy Berger, a member of the Clinton Administration who, during the Bush Administration stole secret documents and got (compared to Manning) a slap on the wrist.
"In today’s America, conservatives who actually want to conserve are as rare as liberals who actually want to liberate. The once-significant language of an earlier era has had the meaning sucked right out of it, the better to serve as camouflage for a kleptocratic feeding frenzy in which both establishment parties participate with equal abandon" (Taking a break from the criminal, incompetent liars at the NSA, to bring you the above political observation, from The Archdruid Report.)