Check me out....Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing, Im └(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┘┌(-.-)┐└(-.-)┐ Dancing.
My Gaming PC: MSI Trident 3 - i7-10700F - RTX 4060 8GB - 32GB DDR4 - 1TB M.2SSD
Cool bill !
Now i hope the man need the consent of the women before cumming. Perhaps chemical castration or obligatory chastity belt and only the woman have the key. This is the ooooonly way this law wouldnt be a piece of shit of a regressive-oppressive law against women.
Nope. Bodily autonomy says "hey, medical procedure? the choice of one person: the person whose body it is".
Child that's born? The responsibility of two parties. Either parent a / b and the state, or parents a and b. You don't get out of caring for an existing child because it might not have existed.
I'm not sure what's the goal here.
If it's for men's rights, then the logical thing to do would've been to allow the father to sign off during pregnancy, not give the men the rights to force the women to go through the pregnancy.
It doesn't make any sense.
Google Diversity Memo
Learn to use critical thinking: https://youtu.be/J5A5o9I7rnA
Political left, right similarly motivated to avoid rival views
[...] we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism)..
While I normally stay out of this area of debate overall as I am neither a supporter or opponent Abortion when done early enough. I do support the idea of the father actually having a say for once which is something that we have sorely lacked.
As it stands, if the woman gets pregnant the man has no say and only liability in the issues.
If he wants to keep it and she doesn't. She can abort it and he can't stop her and can get torn up over it.
If she wants to keep it and he doesn't. She can keep it and he can't stop her and now is forced to pay child support for a child he never agreed to.
I personally would like both parents having a say in what happens to the fetus and child.
If the woman wants to abort and the man wants to keep it, let the man fund the whole thing and a recovery period for the woman who then relinquishes all rights to the child which then becomes sole custody of the father.
If the man wants to abort it and the woman keeps it, the man relinquishes all rights to the child and all financial responsibility to it and the child becomes sole custody of the woman.
This decision must be made before the legal limits on an abortion are reached so both sides have equal say in the matter.
Since we can't call out Trolls and Bad Faith posters and the Ignore function doesn't actually ignore it. Add
"mmo-champion.com##li.postbitignored"
to your ublock or adblock filter to actually ignore ignored posters. Now just need a way to ignore responses to them as well.
Biology isn't exactly far. If men could carry.. then it'd be 100% fair, but they can't, so pregnancy is inherently unfair.
A kid that's alive outside the mother, however? Exactly fair. Mother and father have to pay equally. You can yell about how it's "18 years of slavery" for the father... but it's "18 years of slavery" for the mother, too. 100% fair.
Screw anyone who wants this to happen. Women are not cattle you can breed unless they consent to it. Find willing women to breed. Plenty out there.
Ridicilous and a waste of time. Just make it illegal.
So it's entirely down to the Woman's choice on the Autonomy of the man then, which is unfair. What if the man is tricked? What if the woman poked holes in the condom? What if the condom broke or was defective?
The man needs to STILL go into an uphill legal battle and is chastised with "Well you should have been more careful" while women are told "It's ok, just abort the baby!"
Why is 18 years of fiscal slavery decided entirely out of the hands of the party it will ensnare?