Well, I went to wayback machine but trying to look up snapshots of those pages (who the accounts follow) doesn't work, sadly.
I saw folks linking to articles about who Trump follows on his personal account, but they seem irrelevant given that this claim is about the POTUS/WH accounts.
So I'll remain skeptical until I can dig up/someone else posts confirmation one way or another. But I wouldn't put it past the Trump administration.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Wait.... are you talking about when he went on TV and lied about millions of illegals voting? What is good about him lying, then getting called out on it in a way that showed up how ridiculous his lies were? I mean, unless you are completely delusional and disconnected from reality its obvious his performance was laughable that night.
We do? How? I mean, I agree that it's unlikely he's directly involved, but I see no evidence to would confirm this belief at the moment.
I'll take him over Trump as well, despite him being completely anti-science and socially stuck in the early 1900's, but that's not too much of a step up. At least we won't have to worry about him being a national embarrassment on a daily basis, though.
Exactly. Even where I didn't agree with Ron Paul's position, I respected that he arrived at those positions based on his internal logic and values, and he was willing to be unpopular to maintain his integrity. By contrast, windsock is the perfect euphemism for Rand Paul.
We shall see. The Republican dislike of Russia is pretty strong. They're currently evaluating and calculating whether they can/should make a huge deal out of this.
Interestingly enough Mark Warner was just on CNN saying that they should have been shown the evidence Flynn lied prior to this and in the normal course of intelligence briefing. He hinted at the idea that it was kept from the intelligence oversight. If so, that's a pretty big deal. This will balloon whether the GOP wants it to or not.
They also just reported that Pence wasn't even informed until February 9th, which was when the WaPo story broke. Yea...
Last edited by Cthulhu 2020; 2017-02-14 at 11:25 PM.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
So they kept Pence in the dark.....
I'm willing to bet there's more than a few republicans who are willing to throw Trump under the bus right now. Better that than they block and there's a steady drip drip drip of info over the next two years right up until the midterms....
Just the fact that Trump got elected is enough to validate dictators who don't take US threats seriously because they'll be meaningless next election.... or US allies who can't trust the US to honor its agreements for the same reason.
If everything the US says is subject to change every election, then nothing it says matters.