How to keep Trump from Tweeting according to his campaign staff

[Cyberowl]

want to see you at 70 years old mate

Why? I thought Trump had the bigliest health of them all, that's what he said.

[Skroe]

want to see you at 70 years old mate

I can assure you unlike Putin's Little American Happy Meal, I won't be 50+ lbs overweight and enjoying a steady diet of McDonalds and conspiracy theories.

[Redwyrm]

Even scarier is Trump's advice seeking from Alex Jones

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7595136.html

[Phookah]

8 posts in the thread, and we already had metaphors about toddlers, power sockets, and Street Fighter.

And only 1 post even remotely close to actual logical analysis.

You are probably proud of yourselves.

Take and moment and think about what you're condemning people for being flippant about. (I'll give you a hint: Its about how the White House staff has to cater to our president like he's a small child in order to keep him off Twitter and making them look stupid constantly).

[Deleted]

So they are disgruntled ex-employees?

.../snip/...

It wasn't meant to be taken *that* seriously. :/

[Rafoel]

(I'll give you a hint: Its about how the White House staff has to cater to our president like he's a small child in order to keep him off Twitter and making them look stupid constantly).

So, fake news?

[JohnBrown1917]

Even scarier is Trump's advice seeking from Alex Jones

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7595136.html

They are finally gonna fight back against those damn gay frogs!

[Phookah]

So, fake news?

No, not everything you don't like is fake news. Reality is hard to deal with sometimes, but we need to be adults about it and take our medicine.

[Rafoel]

No, not everything you don't like is fake news. Reality is hard to deal with sometimes, but we need to be adults about it and take our medicine.

Let me present you some logical analysis.

1) The article claims that White House staff has to cater to our president like he's a small child in order to keep him off Twitter and making them look stupid constantly, by your own words.

2) The only way somebody could have such information, is from the White House staff.

3) Meanwhile, what REALLY makes White House staff look stupid, is this article, and their supposed actions.

Consider option A. WH staff really does what article claims, and then tells others about that. Their motives contradict themselves. First they do to great lengths to "avoid looking stupid" and then they do exactly what makes them look the most stupid of all. In other words, option A is not true.

Consider option B. WH staff really does what article claims, but doesn't tell anybody. Then journalist decides to write about that anyway, and somehow hits the jackpot. This option has very low probability of happening.

Consider option C. WH staff doesn't do what article claims, and then tells others that they do. In this case, it's fake news, based on bad intentions of anti-Trump White House employees that somehow made it inside.

Consider option D. WH staff doesn't do what article claims, and tell nobody about that. In this case, it's fake news, invented entirely by article writers, with a logical motive of presenting the president as childish even in the view of his employees, ergo, unfit to serve.

[D3thray]

Did no one else note what these staffers thought the biggest current problem was? That Trump is grumpy because he misses his family?

I mean I don't pay the tweets any mind because at least it makes me feel like he is predictable. Years of Obama saying one thing and doing another wears on an American.

Not to mention Obama didn't have to deal with a media that suddenly found its 'objectivity'.

It's not an excuse. His behavior as president is pretty abysmal. But it's a mitigating factor.

[Dug]

want to see you at 70 years old mate

That's even more of an argument against him. That a 70 year old man can't control his emotions and throws temper tantrums on the internet.

[Independent voter]

The tweets are entertaining.

Trump is not a politician, that's a big part of why he was elected.

[Mormolyce]

How to win on the stock market: read Trump's tweets, buy up stock in whatever he bitches about, sell it once the price rebounds.

Would be shocked if people aren't actually doing this already.

But they still did. Which, last I checked, made someone untrustworthy to you guys.

Okay. It doesn't though.

Having a long history of easily proven lying is what causes that. You know, like Bannon, Conway, and Trump himself.

- - - Updated - - -

Let me present you some logical analysis.

1) The article claims that White House staff has to cater to our president like he's a small child in order to keep him off Twitter and making them look stupid constantly, by your own words.

2) The only way somebody could have such information, is from the White House staff.

3) Meanwhile, what REALLY makes White House staff look stupid, is this article, and their supposed actions.

Consider option A. WH staff really does what article claims, and then tells others about that. Their motives contradict themselves. First they do to great lengths to "avoid looking stupid" and then they do exactly what makes them look the most stupid of all. In other words, option A is not true.

Consider option B. WH staff really does what article claims, but doesn't tell anybody. Then journalist decides to write about that anyway, and somehow hits the jackpot. This option has very low probability of happening.

Consider option C. WH staff doesn't do what article claims, and then tells others that they do. In this case, it's fake news, based on bad intentions of anti-Trump White House employees that somehow made it inside.

Consider option D. WH staff doesn't do what article claims, and tell nobody about that. In this case, it's fake news, invented entirely by article writers, with a logical motive of presenting the president as childish even in the view of his employees, ergo, unfit to serve.

If you actually read the article, the source is former campaign managers, not current WH staff.

[Deleted]

Oh, so this is one of those safe-zones for triggered people I've heard so much about?