Yeah...
Let's look at it tho.
Democrats introducing anti-white christian bills: 0
Republicans introducing anti-black and hispanic bills: "voter ID", a constant effort to push it.
Democrats introducing anti-lgbt bills: 0, they instead made some positive ones.
Republicans introducing anti-lgbt bills: too many to count, and is constant effort via "religious freedom" and "states rights" bills.
But sure, "equally bad".
Well, then I might just have the upper hand on you here - im in the field of medical research myself. Sure, my PhD isn't exactly in "gender dynamics", but I feel I've taken enough courses in for example evolutionary genetics and developmental biology, to at least have a pretty informed opinion on the matter!
But, either way, the biological aspect doesn't matter all that much anyways, it mostly comes down to politics. And it propably should be that way (politics seldom agree with biology on sensitive matters of this nature, after all, and such discussions can easily get rather...ugly - not least for the 'progressive' side of the fence, I'm afraid).
See the issue here is that somethings have no scientific papers because they're self-evident. It's not the job of chemists to prove that water exists, because it's super obvious. The idea of gender is just as obvious, as people feel a sense of self and gender is part of it. As for the idea that you can change your sex you need to define sex first, because people do not agree on what it means.
Considering this keeps dipping back into discussing gender territory despite warnings not to, going to close this