tldr : Sweden's per capita GDP is not growing because immigrant's don't want to work and only receive welfare benefits[/QUOTE]
You can't even type it correctly. It's "immigrants" - not "immigrant's" - hell, I'm an English teacher and even the immigrant students are better at English than you, they definitely deserve everything they can steal from people like you.
[Infracted]
Last edited by Endus; 2017-03-05 at 02:31 AM.
A shame to see Sweden's future looking this way. Here is hoping they can change their policies or implement new ones to prevent this possible future from becoming an inevitable one.
PROUD PROUD PROUD PROUD
PROUD PROUD PROUD PROUD
PROUD PROUD PROUD PROUD
PROUD PROUD PROUD PROUD
PROUD PROUD PROUD PROUD
PROUD PROUD PROUD PROUD
I think they only have 5-10 years until they cross the threshold of Demographic transition in which Swedes will no longer possess a majority in their country and will have to depend on the migrants to assimilate. Which at that point might not happen at all since it hasn't happened already.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
The usual pattern of vigilante is always beat up foreign people for made up reasons. Half the crazed militias in the US might put ''christian'' in the name, but christian is a code name for ''white'' .
(Edited, non productive)
A vigilante group is always about grouping up to beat defenceless people. The proud ghost costume with a cowl heroes of the alt-right ''struggle for the South honor'' was murdering people in armed mobs, with impunity and tacit cooperation from the law enforcement.
Last edited by sarahtasher; 2017-03-05 at 02:49 AM.
Dude, ''vietnamese muslim shopkeepers'' don't exist. That's to point out that the vigilante just beat unharmed people.
in regards to the paper:
1) it's a paper from 2010, before the refugee impact
2) it uses 1970-2005 data and events
3) it's about comparing a handful of methods that compare HDI cohorts to above data
4) the used historical data(HDI calculations) might indirectly show impact of refugees, but this is nowhere mentioned
5) the used characteristics for creating the cohorts are not based on refugees
6) the only refugees mentioned are those leaving a country (and negatively influencing the country they left)
7) it's massively extrapolated based on past events, here's a nice part about their extrapolation:
TL;DR: the paper can not be used for what some people want to use it for.The projections suggest a possible future for the progression of HDIs, but are not designed to be predictive as changes in conditions and policies will impact a particular country’s HDI. Further, unanticipated “shocks,” such as war, economic sanctions, epidemics, and environmental calamities may negatively impact the HDI, while other shocks such as cures for prevalent diseases such as malaria and HIV/AIDS, end of conflict, sudden dramatic investments in and take-up of education, can positively impact a country’s HDI. Thus, the projections should be interpreted as what might occur based on a past global experience with HDI growth, not a normative suggestion as to what will occur.
Last edited by Arenis; 2017-03-05 at 02:54 AM. Reason: added tldr
No, you didn't.
You make the claim, you have to provide the proof. That's how it works.Then again, you can find plenty of information on this topic if you could be arsed to do the legwork.
Then why haven't you been able to provide documentation?The developement of Sweden into dysfunctionality is pretty well documented.
He is going to defend his doctorate, she asks if it ends happily..
The reply makes sense if defending the doctorate is defending the text and the word for such a text sounds like a story. Which it does, obviously
What relevance has that to an immigrant rant?
- - - Updated - - -
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/...G?locations=SE
Seems to me that most of the time the gdp per capita is growing, there are spikes below zero though.
Sweden should've learned from other countries and from their own from history when they let people act like outcasts (like some "integrated" gypsies) who live under welfare, that most of them will also stay like that. Abusing welfare and creating their own underground systems. Leading a lot of feeling of inequity among tax payers and ultimately to aggression. It's not a new phenomenon.
Thats some serious cherry picking and biased way to look at things. The article mostly talked about sweeden exceeding the limit of immigrant absorbtion into their culture. If you bring people in too fast the cultar absorbtion breaks.
The article seems to point out that while immigration isnt bad, too much of it at the same time breaks the system by problems that grow exponentially the faster you take people in. And that they are already far far into the exponential problem.
Seems sweedish citizens are also somewhat intolerant about leaving nearby to non-european immigrants.
Last edited by scrangos; 2017-03-05 at 06:02 AM.