Not really. Some have stronger burst, which makes people think they are 2 button classes and "easier", but in reality not even strong burst classes can push 2 buttons and be competitive outside of rbgs.
- - - Updated - - -
"thought proccess" Lol are you kidding me. I'd be interested to hear about what classes you consider have though process behind thier spells.
None? Each one has a specific purpose...
- - - Updated - - -
If there was no thought process, then people would by using furious slash when the target is below 20% instead of execute. That's just one example, but there is obviously a thought process. Some classes less so than others. Frost DK would be less.
to be honest, I hate how warriors are at the moment in RBG's. play against skilled teams and you struggle to get good damage off as arms or fury.
It's relevant because the great majority of those who actively participate in PvP could care less about 3v3 THUS stating low representation in 3v3 as a reason why DH is NOT broken does not hold water ..
It would be so much easier if they simply put 3v3 inside a bubble and isolate it from the rest of the game because of what you just said: 'Top player play what is good, period.'
I happened to come across a Method video over the weekend with CDEW naming off all he felt was OP and Fury was not on that list..... not even a mention of any warrior spec.
I do believe this is just a bunch of babies whining because they got blown up by a Fury war. Just because you have to be somewhat strategic and can't mindlessly stand still and cast does NOT make Fury OP. For example, I was baited hard by a priest and lock during a bg (they were working together). The lock put down his gate, they moved in close enough to cast, then hit the gate when someone hopped on them and ambushed if the dps followed. Followed once by myself and once with another dps on my team and both times I died and they lived. IF Fury is SOOOOOOOO OP I would have killed one of them. They kited really well, knew when to tank damage and then CC during burst.
Maybe stop complaining on a forum and learn a little bit about the class you are talking about so you know how to counter.
fury warrior, havoc DH, spriest and affli lock are the fotm specs for bg's atm, no point to be in denial about it. The reason is they have few ways out (immunity or mobility), have great damage/uptime and enough ways to prevent enemy to do damage, which is all what matters in the bursty bg meta we have now.
Cdew etc talk about arena, which is a completely different thing compared to bg's and even random bg's and rated are completely different. In random bg's fury and DH yolo jump way out of range of their healers and kill ranged/healer with little support which doesnt happen in rated bg's.
spriests and lock do such amazing pressure and priests heal so much when they have enough VT's rolling.
Charge/hamstring/Battle Cry/Odyns Fury/Raging Blow/Bloodthirst/Avatar/Execute is literally two buttons?
Man, I must have either failed English or math really hard.
Not saying Fury isn't silly at the moment, but being disingenuous does nothing for no-one. In fact, it probably hurts the likelihood of people taking what you're saying seriously which leads to the problem not being addressed/getting worse.
Last edited by Phookah; 2017-04-10 at 09:50 PM.
Any serious PvPer always has a warrior alt in his back pocket. They've been in the top 3 PvP classes pretty much since 2004. FotM more often than not.
HEROES NEVER DIE