.........The rebels are AQ, who are assholes but generally want to control the area known as Syria, terrible yes but they have to at least pretend to not be complete shit until they start winning, Assad's an asshole but in the standard hardly competent how the fuck have you not been killed yet, kind of asshole, The Kurds are alright, then there's ISIS who basically just want to party like 699.
- - - Updated - - -
Well there are 2 ways to look at that, Either Hiroshima and Nagasaki are inarguablly worse than the Holocaust or every time there's a significant government change you get a free pass for what occurs.
Last edited by Allybeboba; 2017-04-15 at 04:41 AM.
The entire country? No but that's it's not like the Kurds want the entire country, they seem content with what they have for the most part, the only bit they want is what the rebels North of Aleppo still have and that's only to connect the Cantons, the only reason they are going for Raqqah is partly because the US wants them to and partly to piss of Turkey.
Syria cannot be ruled by any group as a united nation anymore, I think the best solution is to partition it and let time heal the wounds. at this stage the winning faction will just mass slaughter the groups of people that are linked to the losing side (and by that i mean their supporters or anyone even remotely connected to them)
If Assad wins the whole country back he's gonna kill alot of civilians and his opponents, If the sunni rebels win they're gonna kill the shias, the christians and any other minority group that backed Assad.
Which has like zero relevance with anything. Back at the time we all had armies.
Such a 'murican reply though
- - - Updated - - -
Are you like... for real? There's no clean side in syria. At least Assad represents a stable state, not one where there is going to be another civil war in 3 months, like with any other alternatives.
Not sure what point you're trying to make bit its weak, the media and western opinion is heavily skewed against assad. At times even beyond what's reasonable. Isis themselves tell us about the things they do and the way they want to build aociety.
Last edited by mmocd8deb25f37; 2017-04-15 at 06:09 AM.
Its relevant in that the reason you have "no enemies" is because others defeated them for you. Now you "love" peace because you have nothing to fight for and nothing to fight with....
- - - Updated - - -
Oh, the indiscriminate intentional bombing of civilian targets perhaps?
Meh Russia has a bigger bomb
Called the Father of All Bombs or "Big Daddy"
http://www.news.com.au/world/middle-...7160b4dbec4b95
Russian sources have claimed their weapon has a power equivalent to 44 tons of TNT – or four times that of the MOAB – despite being lighter than its 21,000lb US counterpart at 16,650lb.
Big bombs are nice, i like this one it's sexy.
Dont think anything survived there lol.
I believe that's a Fuel Air Explosive (or "Thermobaric") device. The MOAB is simply a very large conventional explosive device (uses 11 tons of a high explosive composition called H-6).
Fuel Air Explosives can achieve higher yield because the weight of the atmospheric oxygen they consume is not counted in the weight of the device. They are more finicky to set off properly though.
Last edited by Osmeric; 2017-04-15 at 11:19 AM.
"There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
"The bit about hardcore players not always caring about the long term interests of the game is spot on." -- Ghostcrawler
"Do you want a game with no casuals so about 500 players?"
The educated Syrians that left before the war for reasons that weren't related to war or starvation. The ones that understand what would happen if Assad goes. That ones that remember Libya before and after.
Before Syria got destabilized for not signing the right papers, they had a very selective well educated kind of emigration. Doctors and the likes.
The question really is simple. Of the groups involved in this "civil" war, who would present a realistic alternative to Assad without causing bloodshed?
Last edited by mmocd8deb25f37; 2017-04-15 at 11:12 AM.
Awesome! Random AoE is the fucking most awesome thing humans created. But US can do better, can't they?
That is not at all what I have experienced myself. Which kind of hit the coffin nail on this discussion based purely on personal experience. The problem is we don't have any tool to establish the popularity of Assad in Syria apart from the election and a piece of paper, both confirming Assad as the "choice of the Syrians".
Not saying you should listen to that, what I'm saying is you shouldn't assume.
By the way I just noticed we're in the wrong thread.
OT: BIG BOMB GUD!!
Aside from lynchings literally everything you listed is a direct result of policy pushed by multinationals who have used every president in the past 50 years as a puppet
You cucks need to start learning to appreciate whatever western country you live in, because we are far superior to any other culture
Oh and capitalism > every other system
That should trigger you pretty hard lol