You can't volunteer when you're working 80/hours a week. That's my governor's expectation of the working class.
Those that have the time and money, only donate to get around taxes and avoid open revolt.
Class mobility is going to decay even faster with the swift decline of potential jobs, so you should be fighting for general human rights now while you still have some say.
Just give them bigger bootstraps to pull themselves up with.
We're talking about opportunities. People don't work hard and move on if they have no opportunities.
I also dispute the idea that they won't have the right attitude. I didn't squander any of the opportunities I was given. I took them and worked my fucking ass off to get where I am now.
Of course they should be, we do that in Winland, unlike in America, where the poor can't even afford healthcare in CURRENT YEAR.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
Class isn't really defined by income levels. Some blue collar jobs can actually pay decently well, but there is a pretty hard ceiling that limits how high the uneducated average Joe can climb, and they are always very vulnerable to economic shocks and shifts that are totally outside their control. By contrast, your average office drone might not make much to begin with but usually has some avenue to move up the ladder, and has a more transferable skill set meaning that if his company shuts down he can always find another job relatively easily. By contrast, the truly "poor" underclass consists of people that can only find work intermittently, if at all, and mostly depend on various handouts to survive, whereas the "rich" are those who earn enough from investments to never need to actually work.
What do you think the reason is that "inner city" schools lack sufficiently new computers?
Looking around at how things have shaken out, it looks like LA Unified (which is what it sounds like) spent well over a billion dollars buying iPads. It didn't go super well. This may serve as an object lesson in why throwing money at problems doesn't work that well most of the time.
Not better opportunities but equal opportunity.
It is not equivalent to say that parents with money can afford best education with all the perks like nutrition, after class ... and then claim that for working class it is better opportunity to provide the same. It just means that working class children just receive sub-standard education.
The requirements for education standard should be set the same based on whatever info available taking the lowest of the outside factors in consideration.
So this would mean that in public schools the education, nutrition, discipline, sports music .. all are provided. This can only be possible by hiring more teachers per student, adding teachers in specialized fields, counseling and nurturing students on societal values , individual strengths, goals etc.
Current trend is to blame parents for not having time for their children when they are working long hours and multiple jobs to meet other needs.
Also companies that they work for has to has to give time off for parents/children.
Sounds ideal but I would start of with just hiring more teachers and updating the education standard and school facilities instead of cutting at the first sight of budget downfall.
There should be a basic public cultural and education program in place that will afford everyone equal opportunity to succeed in life. Those who can afford it may still send their kids to private universities or charter schools, but the goal to aim for is that they won't even want to.