Demographics assume the same trajectory. But any models that points to the future are pure guesses because you can't obtain data from the future to create a current model.
If the U.S. has a sudden boom of European whites coming into the U.S. or Asians coming into the US that would alter any of the so called models and projections.
Well let's be honest, they don't have a realistic choice anymore.
a) Calls other candidates liars and dishonest. Is shown to lie the most and be the most dishonest. Only defense is "um, everyone does it".
b) Flip-flops on a record number of promises in 100 days, including whether or not 100 days is a big deal. Only defense is "um, everyone flip-flops"
c) Claims to drain the swamp.
d) Claims to protect LBGT.
e) Claims more people will have better coverage, and for less money.
f) Claims he won't start a war.
All they have is "everyone does it" for their candidate who was supposed to be different. They have given up on "he's fighting for me" a while ago, of course.
It may pass the House, but then it will go to the Senate, where it will be amended and bumped back to the house. All passing it will do, is give them a new cheerleading chant while they go on break.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
This is crazy they are going to vote on this lol.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
Good. Last time they wussed out like fucking cowards. Let them sign the dotted line and prove what they stand for. Then, let them go home and tell their voters why.
- - - Updated - - -
AND the 10 essential things, such as pediatric care and ambulances. States can opt out of those, too.
How about I tell the millions of people who will be able to afford health insurance while also eating again instead? It's not the rich who were hurt by obamacare,
it's the working class, specifically those with kids. I agree the system sucks for those with pre existing conditions, but the solution was just as bad as the problem.
9 min left, looks like its going to pass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-B138rYvo8
At this time, there are 131 dems voting yes. WTF . . . am I not reading this correctly?
"My successes are my own, but my failures are due to extremist leftist liberals" - Party of Personal Responsibility
Prediction for the future
Yup. The US spends about 5% of GDP more than most other developed nations, and the ACA really didn't do anything to lower costs (although the rapid rise in healthcare expenditure did level off).
Setting aside the moral arguments for healthcare, and just focusing on lowering the costs, the conversation really needs to be whether we are going to go directly to a single-payer system or whether we should use all-payer rate setting, but the GOP insists on a market approach- which could lower the cost of insurance slightly, but not if young and healthy people opt out. However, a free market approach wouldn't do much to lower the cost of care, because the competitive forces that keep prices down in a normal market don't work in healthcare. It's going to be hard to have an adult conversation about healthcare until the GOP realizes this simple fact.