I'm surprised it took that long for him to blab.
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
It's possible no one is. To take a page from @Skroe they might bring in Mattis to sort of role-play that position for Trump until "a suitable replacement can be found" - for McMasters, not Trump.
Edit: it's also possible I have an overly emotional man-crush on Mattis - but from everything I've read, seen, and heard about him, he would be one of the few that might be able to get away with saying "no" to Trump, and not getting fired.
didn't hillary do the same during the election?
if i remember correctly nothing happened
likely nothing will come from this
Funny how a reporter is on tv lecturing the white house on how to do their jobs lol.
A pizza joint had a child sex ring used by Democratic Party leaders in a basement when it didn't even have a basement? Totally believable.
The idea of a man even inadvertently spilling information to Russian officials that they weren't supposed to have in order to brag about how much information he gets because he has a demonstrable record of narcissism and incompetence? Impossible.
Does that fit this situation where you know they're trying to make laptops into bombs? Why is it better to not tell everyone that isis is trying to make bombs out of laptops? I agree that the notion of not showing your hand fits in some circumstances, but not in one where you need to tell the world what to watch for. Isn't the "non-sharing" of information the exact reason why the successful terroristic plots have gotten through in the past? When we found out that, oh, so and so knew this, and so and so knew that... but no one decided to share that information with everyone else?
I don't think you make the right argument. I think this information should be shared. However, the information should be sanitized to make sure our methods of gathering intel are protected. That, I believe is a valid argument in this case... however, the story is that Trump was not briefed on how the data was collected, so in essence it's impossible for him to spill the beans on that.
Its your moment genn... but the mods arent accepting that, this shit would have blown out argus for the tearing of space time (coz so much warp ins)
Now the current talking point of the trumpettes is that he's such a moron, so its no problem that he released israeli (the mossad wil be pissed) info to russia--------->iran
Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker