I may not be a Finance Major, but I don't really see how either of those things are incompatible with Socialism. It is entirely possible to have market based socialism, which would cover and account for what you are talking about. In fact, in Venezuela, they are pretty much a market based Socialist country, which went to hell because the people running it didn't properly understand the market. If they had had more competent financial advisors and not staked their entire countries well being on a single commodity, they would likely be doing just fine.
Last edited by Surfd; 2017-05-22 at 04:02 AM.
"Finance as parasite" is a common trope, and one which ignores the contexts in which financial panics impede economic activity. Price discovery is primarily a financial phenomenon (albeit through financial markets,) a fact which becomes obvious once you realize that market prices must carry the financial baggage associated with the price. This will be true in any socialist economy with money just as it's true in any capitalist economy with money.
Last edited by Nadiru; 2017-05-22 at 04:12 AM.
Its also unfortunately quite an accuratedescription of the largest capitalist countries on the planet. The financial sectors of these countries are enourmrsly bloated, make their money primarily through rent seeking and speculation, and have captured the political process in order to insure regulation will not be an issue. Is that sufficient context? Finance may be compatible with market socialism but we should have reservations about its tendencies.
"My successes are my own, but my failures are due to extremist leftist liberals" - Party of Personal Responsibility
Prediction for the future
Ah, just when I was wondering where the weekly "lolol venezuela socialism bad! *fapfapfap*" thread was.
Last edited by s_bushido; 2017-05-22 at 04:28 AM.
It's insufficient context because you're implying it happened in a bubble where the finance guys rubbed their hands greedily and said "heh time to fuck these suckers" when in reality it's a more complex issue of (faulty) assumptions about future spending and asset prices, combined with some poor policy choices on the part of governments.
Actually that's exactly what they did.
You remember when congress got a hold of a couple of their internal emails?
"How much of that shitty deal did you sell?"
More broadly the recession was a case of the greatest accounting control fraud in the history of the country probably the world. The best way to rob a bank is to own one.
"My successes are my own, but my failures are due to extremist leftist liberals" - Party of Personal Responsibility
Prediction for the future
Came here to say this.
"Socialism" is a sliding scale, as is "capitalism". In some ways, China is more "capitalist" than the US (anybody who has done business in Shanghai or works for a company that has presence there knows what I'm talking about).
Many of the countries you listed have higher QoL standards than the US and if you've been to any of them, you'll know that citizens there are not exactly hurting for personal wealth
Retired GM of Temerity - US Top 50 raiding on a strict 3 nights since Ulduar. Check us out!
https://www.wowprogress.com/guild/us/hyjal/Temerity
That was my entire point. You can't say a country can switch over to it easily because a literal small community did.
Regardless, Kibbutz was -designed- as a socialist entity, but never really was. Most of its leaders outright stated they were not, and refused to be considered such. Furthermore, most of the economy was used towards annexing or simply taking land to expand, and ousting the people there.
That's like saying American GDP goes into military funding so we can buy other countries, and calling that 'socialism'
Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads"Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab
I dont recall saying finance "isnt necessary". I dont necessarilly think that it is but if it is then its radically different from what finance looks like today. That finance is essentially parasitical and harms economic activity should be evident from what weve discussed. That it can potentially be harnessed to be of some use is neither here nor there.