People would rather be given money than actually have to work for it.
Right.
But the standard of what is "Having a Life" & "Successful", is That, Yes? Living on your own, having your own car, this & that?
But that's why their kids. They have not yet found out that having any of that, doesn't really matter. Or well, it shouldn't. But that is what the Capitalistic mentality promotes.
But it's not sustainable. Especially in a society that injects "fresh-meat" straight into open society, from places & environments that have lived markedly different for generations.
<~$~("The truth, is limitless in its range. If you drop a 'T' and look at it in reverse, it could hurt.")~$~> L.F.
<~$~("The most hopelessly stupid man is he who is not aware he is wise.")~$~> I.A.
Did they say on a poll answered on their Iphones
I am happy to be among the 49%.
I reject capitalism in its unfettered, anarcho-capitalism type. I'm an advocate of Democratic Socialism, or at least the Nordic model if one doesn't want to go that far.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model
" The guilt of an unnecessary war is terrible." --- President John Adams
" America goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy." --- President John Quincy Adams
" Our Federal Union! It must be preserved!" --- President Andrew Jackson
Do they even know what 'capitalism' means? If anything, they reject some vaguely defined corpocracy, commonly called 'capitalism', not capitalism itself.
" The guilt of an unnecessary war is terrible." --- President John Adams
" America goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy." --- President John Quincy Adams
" Our Federal Union! It must be preserved!" --- President Andrew Jackson
I advocate it too, but unfortunately this is a luxury only rich countries may afford. Imagine Norway or Sweden with poverty rates similar to poverty in 3rd world countries. There would be not enough wealth to maintain the system (lower taxes revenues), and the pressure on the system would be much higher, due to the big amount of people depending on welfare and public services.
Before reaching the point nording countries reached, a country needs to embrace capitalism to develop itself to generate wealth (theres no better system to generate wealth than capitalism). Private sector generates wealth, not the government (it consumes wealth), so, if a country wants to get rich, just make easier for the people to open and maintain their business.
Nordic system is not a system to be applied on the majority of the world, at least, for now.
Last edited by igualitarist; 2017-05-30 at 01:38 AM.
rejecting capitalism is rather silly. Most economies are mixed including the usa. So these kids who are voting for socialism are forgetting that. In fact if you look through much of our history we have been socialistic even before fdr social reform. Such examples are rail road grants holding public lands to build schools. Even public education so the reality of capitalism ever being a 100% pure here in the usa is as false as communism existing. Outside of that issue neoliberalism seriously needs to be revived and given the 100% truth. I feel like a lot of kids do not give it the proper justice it needs and separate it from Pinochet's regime.
Last edited by Taso; 2017-05-30 at 01:41 AM.
I'm kinda siding with the kid. And while OP's post seem disingenuous, 51% of people isn't 51% of those aged 18-29. Possibly the future, but definitely not all people.
And I don't know if the Pelosi quotes are out of context, but she seems to say that there is a disparity where CEO's kept wages low and gave themselves huge raises, and how she pointed out, but then goes on to say, 'oh well', that's capitalism and we are capitalist. And if that's the party line of the Democratic Party, then they are going to lose a lot of potential voters in the coming elections.
Granted, 18-29, are college years, and a very visionary, idealistic time for a lot of kids. Reality, and the real world aren't part of their collective DNA yet.
Here is a 2017 list of the worlds happiest countries. Guess what, most of them are socialist.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/20/travel...-nations-2017/
Why are people so quick to point out the failures of socialism, but not the success stories. I could just as easily point out Somalia as a capitalistic failure.
1.) Sweden
2.) Denmark
3.) Norway
4.) Canada
5.) Netherlands
6.) Finland
7.) Switzerland
8.) Iceland
9.) Germany
All socialist countries and all among the happiest countries in the world.
you mean social democracy? And isn't cdu in Germany a center right christian democracy with Rhine capitalism/social market as opposed to a regulated social democratic one. Secondly the history of Somalia is not a capitalist failure. Somalia was a Authoritarian socialist leaning country that was successful to a certain point it milked both sides of the cold war. When they tried to invade communist Ethiopia the soviets under retaliation funded a rebel group which ended up destroying the country along withthe humiliating defeat. Thats why it failed and collapsed. I could also point to Zimbabwe as an example of failed socialism but hopefully you get my point.
Last edited by Taso; 2017-05-30 at 01:57 AM.