Last edited by mmocc02219cc8b; 2017-06-21 at 01:29 PM.
-=From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine. Your kind claimed your flesh as if it will not decay and fail you. One day the crude biomass that you call a temple will wither, and you will beg my kind to save you... But I am already saved..... For the machine is immortal=-
so you won't end up being gassed in some future... so you won't end up with people running around streets (modern equivalent: spamming this on social media) and incite people to burn witches, lynch negros and round up jews... you know, usual extremist stuff that actually happened before but people tend to forget that people are fucking retarded
Originally Posted by Urban Dictionary
It's not like it's a thought police. It's threats, coercion and incitement to racism what we are talking about. There is seldom room for interpretation when someone writes "f*** off nig*** go kill yourself" under every picture or comment a person posts on the internet. Or when black bloc members tell other people to go smash cars, assault people and set things on fire openly on Facebook and Twitter.
You shouldn't have the choice to freely engage in racist or threatening actions towards people without penalties.
Yes, it does help to stop conflicts if the state handles it rather than letting people take it in their own hands due to the state not intervening.
This is pretty much Germany in a nut shell, they had anti Jewish laws only 1 lifetime ago so why would you think they would be any different now. You do get that law doesn't = right? You would have been a fantastic nazi supporter believing laws are right and all.
(Infracted)
Last edited by mmocc02219cc8b; 2017-06-21 at 01:33 PM.
I think it's right because racism creates friction in society. Someone else thinks it's wrong because people should be allowed to speak their minds freely. How do we determine who is actually right from an objective point of view when it comes down to personal preferences and opinions?
You think I'm wrong because of your personal preferences, I think I'm right because of my personal preferences.
Last edited by Freighter; 2017-06-21 at 11:33 AM.
the government its what the largest group elects. without a constitutional (or similar legal protection) protection to free speech this kinda law can easily become a toll of the majority to suppress the speech of the minority but just labeling it hateful in one way or another.