1.3 million won't go far. Especially for long term care of a kid like that. He will become a ward of the US. Chronic care for a ventilated patient is extremely expensive. Not to mention the cost of transporting a critically ill patient from Europe to the US. What's been be raised will quickly exhausted.
Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. -Bertrand Russell
Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
I agree with Endus (see it happens!). The doctors and judges previously involved all have families, probably children of their own. It's too easy to dehumanize them as 'da gubmint' when you disagree with them. The media narrative nearly always omits key details. Those intimately involved must have found reason enough to take Charlie's parents all the way up the courts knowing full well the agony his parents were facing. Balancing that with their duty to do no harm they thought it best to keep him where he is.
I don't know that there is going to be a right answer here, or even a good one, but the judgment of Charlie's doctors should carry a whole lot more weight than I feel it is being given.
I'm the one not thinking clearly? lol
More like $2-3mil make people say the darnest things about other people's prospects.
So what happens when his medical condition deteriorates after this treatment, and he's too sick to be moved again? Will he be a US resident indefinitely?
Meanwhile The White House has proposed nearly $6 billion in cuts to the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, which provides health care coverage for 8.9 million low-income children. The president’s budget also proposes $1.4 trillion in cuts over the next 10 years to Medicaid, which provides health care to approximately 37 million more poor children.
But now they have a shiny new political prop.
Splendid. So of course they will need to test more treatments afterwards. I've been through this route myself with family, it's not pretty, and while in my case it was covered by the State, the kid's family ain't so lucky.
As for the question someone asked about assisted suicide, I'm in favor of it too. So long as it's the decision of the patient, and that more than one doctor is involved in the process. There comes a point where being alive means nothing if you're in constant pain and you just cannot take it anymore, and are going to die regardless.
Paying for the treatment means fuckall.
If it cost a dollar, it would still be wrong.
Yes, but the difference is that he's not conscious and cannot make the decision. While I think efforts to prolong his life are futile, that the US doctors are banking on a forlorn hope and that the dolts in Congress are profiteers of the highest order, I'm still unsure that this verdict should be thrust upon desperate parents.
Yet at some point someone has to make the call, I suppose.
You hope the family flies to the USA, wastes nearly a million dollars, and that maybe, just maybe, the treatment works (about a 0.1% chance) so that the kid actually regains enough mental capacity to fully understand how much he is suffering, just so he can suffer more and then die (his death is 100% guaranteed)?
That's rather sick.
Edit: Never mind, just found out that the "Treatment" is only to see if they can maybe restore a bit of muscle functiuonality. So the kid is still going to be a permanent vegetable, still in permanent pain, and still attached to machines for the rest of his incredibly short, incredibly painful life. At least he will never be cognizant enough to know that his parents are torturing him.
- - - Updated - - -
Except that the baby is currently little better than a vegetable mentally, and will NEVER get better.
Last edited by Surfd; 2017-07-20 at 07:03 AM.