Page 25 of 30 FirstFirst ...
15
23
24
25
26
27
... LastLast
  1. #481
    Void Lord Doctor Amadeus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    In Security Watching...
    Posts
    43,795
    Quote Originally Posted by StayTuned View Post
    The fuck, you children.

    As if the lot of you even knows what a Nazi is except for its Wikipedia definition.

    Alt right is no more a real Nazi thing than antifa is. Both are just a collection of new age losers who can't see the hypocrisy in their actions.

    None of you wants the real Nazis back. They're not the internet meme as many here believe
    It sounds as if the person you are describing is actually yourself.

    Nazi's are pro white supremacist national socialist, as for what I have or haven't endured by the real Nazi some like to Normalize like some confused Alt-Right idiots. No I actually don't need to be tolerant of people that hold those sort of views, and I damn sure am Ok with seeking no middle ground.
    Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis

  2. #482
    They aren't Neo Nazis they are internet people... that's all they are.

    This entire Trump Election was just one big game that was ran by the likes of 4Chan goers, True Capitalist Radio fans, and other internet shit holes. The entire idea is to rebuild democracy by making the current one a laughing stock of the world and eventually throwing the system into chaos.

    These people have put the weaknesses of freedom and democracy on display so that the sinister may exploit...

    It goes like this...

    Internet People: We sway hearts, minds and opinions through basic memes. We are a silent misunderstood power. That makes us strong. Fuck the system. Let's use our powers of persuasion to exploit democracy by tricking the public into electing someone retarded.


    It seems to have worked...

    This is why at first I hated the idea of the FCC tightening things up. Now I get it and actually desire it. Fuck the internet. Let it burn.

  3. #483
    Quote Originally Posted by XangXu View Post
    They aren't Neo Nazis they are internet people... that's all they are.

    This entire Trump Election was just one big game that was ran by the likes of 4Chan goers, True Capitalist Radio fans, and other internet shit holes. The entire idea is to rebuild democracy by making the current one a laughing stock of the world and eventually throwing the system into chaos.

    These people have put the weaknesses of freedom and democracy on display so that the sinister may exploit...

    It goes like this...

    Internet People: We sway hearts, minds and opinions through basic memes. We are a silent misunderstood power. That makes us strong. Fuck the system. Let's use our powers of persuasion to exploit democracy by tricking the public into electing someone retarded.


    It seems to have worked...

    This is why at first I hated the idea of the FCC tightening things up. Now I get it and actually desire it. Fuck the internet. Let it burn.
    Yeah, and the FCC is still headed by a Republican and much less held back by democrats, good luck getting your intended results.
    "My successes are my own, but my failures are due to extremist leftist liberals" - Party of Personal Responsibility

    Prediction for the future

  4. #484
    Merely a Setback Trassk's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Having a beer with dad'hardt
    Posts
    26,315
    When I see old footage of Nazis burning books, and then look at how the far left wants to censor all information they find offensive, its pretty hard to believe the shit touted by them that only the right are like Nazis.
    #boycottchina

  5. #485
    Deleted
    alt right are not communists , how is alt right nazis ?

  6. #486
    Good luck ever trying to define the alt right or it's 'members'.
    I am the lucid dream
    Uulwi ifis halahs gag erh'ongg w'ssh


  7. #487
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryme View Post
    Good luck ever trying to define the alt right or it's 'members'.
    Easy. Far right white nationalists who reject mainstream conservatism.

  8. #488
    Quote Originally Posted by Elba View Post
    Easy. Far right white nationalists who reject mainstream conservatism.
    Trouble is, you can't just pluck a definition out the air and claim it to be true any more than people can claim feminism is "misandric women", it's dumb and has nothing supporting it.

    Even if that was true, all it would take is to find one far right wing nationalist who rejects mainstream conservationism and the alt-right and you're done. That's easy found in one Paul Joseph Watson - the guy who makes the awful YouTube videos. He's far right, he constantly goes on about "dah mainstreem me de uh" and has openly rejected the alt right.
    I am the lucid dream
    Uulwi ifis halahs gag erh'ongg w'ssh


  9. #489
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryme View Post
    Trouble is, you can't just pluck a definition out the air and claim it to be true any more than people can claim feminism is "misandric women", it's dumb and has nothing supporting it.
    That's the first sentence on Wikipedia.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryme View Post
    Even if that was true, all it would take is to find one far right wing nationalist who rejects mainstream conservationism and the alt-right and you're done. That's easy found in one Paul Joseph Watson - the guy who makes the awful YouTube videos. He's far right, he constantly goes on about "dah mainstreem me de uh" and has openly rejected the alt right.
    Or maybe he is lying. Or he is alt Lite. Dude is a racist, nationalistic, conspiracy theorist. Fits pretty well.

  10. #490
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryme View Post
    Trouble is, you can't just pluck a definition out the air and claim it to be true any more than people can claim feminism is "misandric women", it's dumb and has nothing supporting it.
    Are you able to read dictionaries?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right

    Quote Originally Posted by Wikipedia
    The alt-right, or alternative right, is a loose group of people with far-right ideologies who reject mainstream conservatism in favor of white nationalism, principally in the United States, but also to a lesser degree in Canada and Europe
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryme View Post
    That's easy found in one Paul Joseph Watson - the guy who makes the awful YouTube videos. He's far right, he constantly goes on about "dah mainstreem me de uh" and has openly rejected the alt right.
    Paul Joseph Watson is a Putin Troll. And abandoned the american alt right once Trump showed he wont support Russia.

    I wonder how some people are blind and easy victims when it is about right extremism and right wing propaganda.
    Last edited by mmoc903ad35b4b; 2017-08-02 at 09:39 AM.

  11. #491
    Quote Originally Posted by rym View Post
    Are you able to read dictionaries?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right
    Do you really think people that are called Alt-right on the internet are white nationalists? I'm actually curious if you think there are that many out there. Most people that are called Alt-right are just kids shitposting to get reactions, they don't have some great goal, or plan. They just think it's funny when people flip out because they said something racist. Sure some of them make nazi jokes, primarily because it gets the response they're looking for.

    It's almost like the internet forgot the age old rule; Don't feed the trolls.

  12. #492
    Quote Originally Posted by rym View Post
    Are you able to read dictionaries?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right
    lol are we really going to try and use wikipedia as the reasoning engine here?

    Quote Originally Posted by Elba View Post
    Or maybe he is lying. Or he is alt Lite. Dude is a racist, nationalistic, conspiracy theorist. Fits pretty well.
    He probably is. My point is that a group that doesn't define itself, have any central body or anything official at all does not have a strict definition.
    I am the lucid dream
    Uulwi ifis halahs gag erh'ongg w'ssh


  13. #493
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryme View Post
    lol are we really going to try and use wikipedia as the reasoning engine here?
    Are you going to question facts for your agenda?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryme View Post
    He probably is. My point is that a group that doesn't define itself, have any central body or anything official at all does not have a strict definition.
    If the majority of a group are neo nazis, you are able to call the group a neo nazi organization.

    Next you want to pretend the Klu Klux Klan isnt racist, only because it also contains one single black person.

  14. #494
    Quote Originally Posted by rym View Post
    Are you going to question facts for your agenda?
    Did you read the supporting articles? There's no supporting evidence in any of them - the first is close to opinion piece, the second and third assume definition and the last is talking about Richard Spencer.
    I am the lucid dream
    Uulwi ifis halahs gag erh'ongg w'ssh


  15. #495
    I am Murloc!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Bordeaux, France
    Posts
    5,923
    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Dracula View Post
    Lol ok.

    I see you got a tad upset about the "Antifa being Fascists" Thread.

    Protip: The current "regressive" left is far more inline with being Neo-Nazis than the alt-right purely through their actions.
    totally man

    Willing to provide access to health coverage and education for all is so morally bankrupt.
    and Bernie Sanders is Hitler personified.

  16. #496
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryme View Post
    Did you read the supporting articles? There's no supporting evidence in any of them - the first is close to opinion piece, the second and third assume definition and the last is talking about Richard Spencer.
    "Wikipedia is biased" .. "Lügenpresse"..

    Are those your arguments?

    Learn to discuss, Ryme. A discussion involves arguments to counter theories. If you think Wikipedias definition is just a theory, bring arguments why they do. Up to then, you just call a dictionary a liar because it doesnt fit to your bias.
    Last edited by mmoc903ad35b4b; 2017-08-02 at 10:08 AM.

  17. #497
    They are indeed often classified as neo nazis.

  18. #498
    Quote Originally Posted by rym View Post
    "Wikipedia is biased" .. "Lügenpresse"..

    Are those your arguments?
    No, my argument was the sources used in that article for the first sentence weren't very good.
    I am the lucid dream
    Uulwi ifis halahs gag erh'ongg w'ssh


  19. #499
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryme View Post
    No, my argument was the sources used in that article for the first sentence weren't very good.
    Oh, so it is about the "quality" of a line of a dictionary definition? While you cant bring any argument to counter the definition?
    Last edited by mmoc903ad35b4b; 2017-08-02 at 10:14 AM.

  20. #500
    Quote Originally Posted by rym View Post
    Oh, so it is about the "quality" of a line of a dictionary definition? While you cant bring any argument to counter the definition?
    I'm not the one making the argument, burden falls on those that are.
    I am the lucid dream
    Uulwi ifis halahs gag erh'ongg w'ssh


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •