Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
LastLast
  1. #1
    Herald of the Titans Dangg's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    EUROPE
    Posts
    2,944

    Innocent man who was released after 30 years of death row won't get compensated

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...up-executions/

    I thought you'd at least get a shitton of cash - not that any amount would make up for it - after the state wants to murder you and takes away 30 years of your life.

  2. #2
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    "Innocent"

    He wasn't found innocent, the Supreme Court overturned his conviction because his defense attorney didn't give him an adequate defense. They basically declared a belated mistrial.

  3. #3
    I'm sure he has some kind of legal route he could take. Other than applying through the committee, if it came down to it. I feel like this happened with the Netflix guy, the state didn't want to pay recompense, so he prepared to sue and they decided to settle and he conveniently went back to jail again.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    "Innocent"

    He wasn't found innocent, the Supreme Court overturned his conviction because his defense attorney didn't give him an adequate defense. They basically declared a belated mistrial.
    It's sad when all you have to do to get away with murder is hire a shitty attorney.

  5. #5
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    "Innocent"

    He wasn't found innocent, the Supreme Court overturned his conviction because his defense attorney didn't give him an adequate defense. They basically declared a belated mistrial.
    And then they couldn't make the evidence 'work' again because it didn't add up.

    Seems like a classic case of injustice.

  6. #6
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by ctd123 View Post
    And then they couldn't make the evidence 'work' again because it didn't add up.

    Seems like a classic case of injustice.
    That may very well be the case, that doesn't change the fact that he was released on a technicality... He wasn't released because his innocence was proven.

  7. #7
    He will likely be able to sue, and will be compensated.

  8. #8
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    That may very well be the case, that doesn't change the fact that he was released on a technicality... He wasn't released because his innocence was proven.
    And he wasn't proven guilty based on any evidence beyond a stitch up which cost him 30 years and almost murdered by the state.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by ctd123 View Post
    murdered
    You use that word as if you know what it means.

  10. #10
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Heladys View Post
    You use that word as if you know what it means.
    pendantic on a legal term. Would you have prefered slaughtered? Executed? dispatched or slain?

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    That may very well be the case, that doesn't change the fact that he was released on a technicality... He wasn't released because his innocence was proven.
    Innocent until proven guilty.
    The wise wolf who's pride is her wisdom isn't so sharp as drunk.

  12. #12
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    "Innocent"

    He wasn't found innocent, the Supreme Court overturned his conviction because his defense attorney didn't give him an adequate defense. They basically declared a belated mistrial.
    Yeah, I think you and I didn't read the same article. He's innocent because he didn't do it. And now AL wants to speed up the execution of people.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by McTroll View Post
    It's sad when all you have to do to get away with murder is hire a shitty attorney.
    Or even worse when you're convicted of a cirme you didn't commit. And then spent 30 years in solitary. And then not only do the people who wronged you not pay for their mistake, they pass legislation in which you would have been executed before the evidence that set you free had been examined.

    Awesome.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by ctd123 View Post
    And he wasn't proven guilty based on any evidence beyond a stitch up which cost him 30 years and almost murdered by the state.
    Exactly. Are people just guessing as to what the article says without reading it?

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by ctd123 View Post
    pendantic on a legal term. Would you have prefered slaughtered? Executed? dispatched or slain?
    Removed from circulation?

    Also: When can the state expect restitution payments for 30 years of room, board, entertainment, and education? Oh, and health care!

  14. #14
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    He will likely be able to sue, and will be compensated.
    It sure doesn't seem like it, at least according to the article.

  15. #15
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    "Innocent"

    He wasn't found innocent, the Supreme Court overturned his conviction because his defense attorney didn't give him an adequate defense. They basically declared a belated mistrial.
    Really? You are that much of a racist cunt you are carrying this on one? Choose your battles mate. An acquittal is an acquitall.

    Infracted
    Last edited by Darsithis; 2017-08-04 at 06:04 PM. Reason: infracted

  16. #16
    Honorary PvM "Mod" Darsithis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    51,235
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    That may very well be the case, that doesn't change the fact that he was released on a technicality... He wasn't released because his innocence was proven.
    You don't prove innocence in America.

  17. #17
    I am Murloc! Noxx79's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Kansas. Yes, THAT Kansas.
    Posts
    5,474
    Quote Originally Posted by Heladys View Post
    Removed from circulation?

    Also: When can the state expect restitution payments for 30 years of room, board, entertainment, and education? Oh, and health care!
    Wow, prison seems like such a wonderful place! You should go there!

    I assume you think slaves were happy and not mistreated because they got food and lodgings?

    It's pretty unamerican to not value personal autonomy.

  18. #18
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Darsithis View Post
    You don't prove innocence in America.
    You do if you were already convicted of a crime and want it overturned. Unless, like in this case, it is overturned due to a legal technicality.

  19. #19
    I am Murloc! Noxx79's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Kansas. Yes, THAT Kansas.
    Posts
    5,474
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    You do if you were already convicted of a crime and want it overturned. Unless, like in this case, it is overturned due to a legal technicality.
    Subsequent tests of the only physical evidence in the case raised serious doubts about whether the weapon in Hinton’s home had fired those bullets — and it even called into question whether the bullets were all fired from the same gun.
    Bad and false evidence is "a legal technicality" ?

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by cubby View Post
    Or even worse when you're convicted of a cirme you didn't commit.
    Except he wasn't released for that reason, but rather because of a procedural vice, and because presumption of innocence prevails when that happens.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •