The disconnect here is, still, after all these years of talking about this shit, that people seem to think poor, unemployed people in Finland haven't already been getting "free money" for decades, and that this "experiment" is somehow a new thing.
It's not new.
"Basic income" is just another name for welfare. Finland has had an extensive welfare system for ages now. Incidentally, people who are in that experiment now, are still getting welfare on top of the basic income, because the amount of basic income is less than what Finnish welfare actually is.
In Finland, you can make 300€/month and it won't cut into your welfare. After 300€/month, every 1€ you make cuts your welfare by 50c. This is the case on basic income, as well. However, the basic income forms a minimum base that won't be cut, regardless of your income. While now your welfare will be cut all the way down to 0€ eventually, with basic income, you'd always get the 560€/month or whatever it will end up being. This is meant to allow you to work gigs, part time jobs, and so on, without shooting yourself in the foot, as right now, it's pretty much pointless for a lot of people to do that. We used to have a system where we didn't have the 300€/month cut-free income, and that's when people had absolutely no reason to do any part time jobs, as they wouldn't be making any money at all.
However, for those "lazy people" who wouldn't choose to work, basic income in Finland isn't going to make any goddamn difference to the current system. That's just not something people seem to get into their thick skulls.