Originally Posted by
Endus
The problem with your argument, here, is that you're not making an argument against Socialism. You're making an argument against a very specific and extreme form of socialism, where the specific characteristics you've described, the lack of incentives, the planned centralized non-market economy, the lack of profit motives, the state ownership of all property, those are all features of that extremism and totalitarianism, not the underlying base concept of socialism.
Nothing you said there describes socialist theory as a whole. It's as nonsensical as trying to claim that no country in the world is capitalist because governments own some property, somewhere.