Trump still has not condemned the Minnesota mosque bombing. Muslim leaders are waitin

[Varvara Spiros Gelashvili]

I remember you conservatives crying about Obama not vilifying the incident with the officers getting killed in TX. fast enough. So now it's happening to your Messiah, you want to cry about it?

Trump has a history of only calling out attacks on certain demographics and ignoring the opposite despite running on America first which makes him a hypocrite. The white house also claimed. The attack might've been faked by liberals but they still won't admit to jumping to conclusion about the mosque attack in Canada or the one made up by Conway.

This just sort of happened for the people trying to defend Trump action but meh w/e.

https://thinkprogress.org/white-hous...-liberals/amp/

[Themius]

Why should he condemn it?

Why should he condemn terrorist attacks against Americans? That question doesn't seem like a bright question.

[Mormolyce]

Surprised he hasn't listed it as an act of Islamic extremism like last time kek.

LoL Bitch, the only thing you have ever bashed was your cock in your moms basement while watching youporn.com.

Uneducated internet tough guys belong in the other sub forums, not in GenOT.

[Infracted]

You realise that a triggered rant like this is exactly what he's after? Scalp claimed.

- - - Updated - - -

What I find extremelly amusing is the fact that you get more news articles related to Trumps silence than the actual event.

No shit.

Why beat yourself up?

You're tempting me to start using a bash the fash avatar and see if you trigger yourself into oblivion.

[pionock]

What exactly do you gain by a President condemning an action we all know to be bad? What do the people gain from a President giving some half-hearted words about a tragedy? Deep down, we all know when a public official talks about something like this, those words aren't really theirs. So why ask the same thing of Trump? At least half of you on this site don't give a shit what he has to say on anything, as you'll just deem it -phobic or -ist of something.

[oxymoronic]

Aaaand that's why you bash the fash, you don't elect them president of dangerous countries

is this guy for real or this a late april joke? "dangerous"

[anyaka21]

lets be fair though, Obama never condemned the gunning down of a white college baseball player by 3 bored black teens.

[oxymoronic]

You're tempting me to start using a bash the fash avatar and see if you trigger yourself into oblivion.

highly doubt this forum would allow that. oh wait, far left not far right, proceed.

- - - Updated - - -

lets be fair though, Obama never condemned the gunning down of a white college baseball player by 3 bored black teens.

only think i can remember obama coming out and saying was this could have been my son crap. then again i really wasnt listening... but i do know this, his wife dont give one fuck about white people and it doesnt stop there.

- - - Updated - - -

Why should he condemn terrorist attacks against Americans? That question doesn't seem like a bright question.

most likely self inflicted terrorist attacks. who has anything to gain from doing this? to an empty room... ask yourself

[Cthulhu 2020]

highly doubt this forum would allow that. oh wait, far left not far right, proceed.

It's funny how conservatives can't take responsibility for their own actions. Broke forum rules? Insulted someone and told them to go die? "WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH THIS FORUM HATES CONSERVATIVES!"

Tons of infractions handed out to leftists on this forum all the time for breaking forum rules, and they don't bitch about it. Guess it seems one side is better at taking personal responsibility than the other... and it's not the ones who preach at everyone else to do so.

[Zoibert the Bear]

I remember you conservatives crying about Obama not vilifying the incident with the officers getting killed in TX. fast enough. So now it's happening to your Messiah, you want to cry about it?

You managed to be hyperbolic and throw anecdotal evidence together into a single post as if that means anything.

- - - Updated - - -

Wow, the bomb tore through the mosque, anyone have a final death/injury count? When I read 'tore through' it makes me think of all the bombings in middle eastern mosques that had extremely high death counts, yet nobody in the western media gave a damn about or pressed the president for a statement. I mean, I'm sure all the people focusing on this were equally concerned with the Herat mosque bombing 3 days ago that killed 29 people... oh wait there was barely any coverage of that in the American media.

Why is it that the United States, that is engaged in military action in like a dozen countries, has enough foreign military bases that sometimes it seems like we are engaging in military occupation on a global scale, has a media that pays almost no attention to what is happening in foreign countries. Why is it that if you want to know whats happening in Iraq, you usually have to go to the BBC or The Guardian or RT? Its as if the sole purpose of the corporate media in the US is to act as a mouthpiece for the deep state, which means never pushing any stories that risk making people question profitable rackets like war.

Because covering paranoid islamophobia claims is more important than dead Muslims.

[jdbond592]

Why would he? He represents a White, Christian America. Liberals can be terrorists if they are not white. Or non-whites in general can be terrorist. When they are white, we better choose our words carefully. We won't mention their race. But we must always mention the race of non-whites. Even if they are the victims. They had it coming.

Friend, we have captured the essence of MAGA and what they mean when they say they want to go back..

[cparle87]

Why should he condemn it?

Aren't liberals supposed to be all about accepting other people's differences? Like their religion and the 50 or so genders?

[jdbond592]

This might make sense if we actually knew who committed the crime, but right now it just sounds like nonsense.

Possible. Likely a liberal black Mexican did it. Keep the hope!

[Super Kami Dende]

Really? Something like this actually requires public condemnation? I mean I can't really see Americans as a group sitting there going "Hmmm, kind of on the Fence about this bombing, I mean the President hasn't said it is Bad yet.. so what do we do?"

Funnily enough the people that would be complaining the most about Trump not condemning it publically are the same that constantly screech about how Muslims shouldn't have to apologise/condemn other bombings because "OMG WHY SHOULD THEY HAVE TO SAY ANYTHING BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE SIMILAR TO THEM DID SOMETHING WRONG #notallmuslims!!"

Better to ignore attention seeking terrorists.

[GreenJesus]

NO one was hurt and damage to building can be easily repaired. Why should Trump care? North Korea is threatening to nuke Guam.

[jdbond592]

Aren't liberals supposed to be all about accepting other people's differences? Like their religion and the 50 or so genders?

They are unless these "differences" call for hate and genocide? I no more tolerate Sharia than I tolerate "stone the heathens"..

[jdbond592]

Really? Something like this actually requires public condemnation? I mean I can't really see Americans as a group sitting there going "Hmmm, kind of on the Fence about this bombing, I mean the President hasn't said it is Bad yet.. so what do we do?"

Funnily enough the people that would be complaining the most about Trump not condemning it publically are the same that constantly screech about how Muslims shouldn't have to apologise/condemn other bombings because "OMG WHY SHOULD THEY HAVE TO SAY ANYTHING BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE SIMILAR TO THEM DID SOMETHING WRONG #notallmuslims!!"

Better to ignore attention seeking terrorists.

It was only mentioned in the sense that Trump was more than happy to chip in on London bombing or any Muslim related violence in America without anyone asking for his input. SO clearly has problem with "radical Islamic" terrorism and not terrorism in general.

[Super Kami Dende]

why would antifa be terrorists then ?

anti_fascism it means they are against fascism so they cant promote violence and hatred

Yet that seems to be all they do?

[Super Kami Dende]

It was only mentioned in the sense that Trump was more than happy to chip in on London bombing or any Muslim related violence in America without anyone asking for his input. SO clearly has problem with "radical Islamic" terrorism and not terrorism in general.

So if no one asked for his input then, wouldn't they still not want his input? Help me out here, It's so hard to follow liberal double standards when it comes to complaining about Trump

[Uoyredrum]

What I find extremelly amusing is the fact that you get more news articles related to Trumps silence than the actual event.

Once again, goes to show the agenda the left is pushing around, not their unconditional love for the oppressed, but their viciousness to push every opposing view into a cess pit. Back to the middle ages I say!

Like Fox News's agenda to attack Obama for his choice of mustard?

But yeah he should probably condemn the attack. He never really seems to say anything unless white people get hurt though, not that I can recall at least. And for whoever said "they probably told him not to say anything yet"...when has that ever stopped him? He goes and blabs classified info to foreign agents, you think his aides are going to stop him from condemning a mosque bombing?

[GreenJesus]

Is trump supposed to tweet every time someone gets shot too?