1. #1

    Wealthy man closes public beach for his own use

    https://www.theguardian.com/environm...c-vinod-khosla

    So tell me: does everything and everybody have a price for that billion dollar man?

  2. #2
    Deleted
    I couldn't really care less tbh

  3. #3
    ...and then loses the court case to keep it closed.


    Whose sock account is this, anyway?

  4. #4
    The Unstoppable Force Elim Garak's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    DS9
    Posts
    20,297
    He bought it fair and square. Now a bunch of freeloaders are going to infest his private property.
    All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by s_bushido View Post
    Whose sock account is this, anyway?
    ...where the name doesn't matter.

  6. #6
    The actual title of the article is:

    Silicon Valley billionaire loses bid to prevent access to public beach

    https://www.theguardian.com/environm...c-vinod-khosla

    There are a lot of arguments in California over beach access as you can imagine. If you have a house on the beach you might not own the beach and it's often the case.
    .

    "This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."

    -- Capt. Copeland

  7. #7
    Why should a rich dude who legitimately owns the land have to allow the public onto it? That's retarded.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by thesib View Post
    Why should a rich dude who legitimately owns the land have to allow the public onto it? That's retarded.
    Because its California

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by s_bushido View Post
    ...and then loses the court case to keep it closed.


    Whose sock account is this, anyway?
    These topics seem pretty Jaylocky to me.
    Disarm now correctly removes the targets’ arms.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •