Trumps blames "alt left" for Charlottesville and "very fine people" on both sides.

[Somewhatconcerned]

Astounded by the level of mental gymnastics in here to make it seem like Nazi flags on American soil is a good thing.

The "greatest generation" fought and died against this ideology. Thought people on the right we're supposed to be so pro military? Yet you defile our past and present service members with this Nazi sympathizing.

[TheFirstOnes]

So wait let me understand this...

When two sides go into a violent street brawl wielding clubs,shields,and impromptu flame throwers... neither side is the good guys?

Color me shocked!

This.

Neither side's the innocent one, here.

[Elegiac]

Not everyone on the Alt-right are Nazi's. They may be red-necks, or something like that. But not Nazi's.

No, they are. Alt-right is specifically a modern euphemism for what we would traditionally term neo-nazis.

And not everyone on the Alt-left are terrorists, either.

No one on the 'alt-left' is a terrorist because it doesn't exist.

Infact, I was once a liberal, and I voted Trump. So, I don't get the point in saying that i'm defending Nazi's. Cause, clearly, i'm not.

In which case you aren't a liberal.

[Xeones]

So wait let me understand this...

When two sides go into a violent street brawl wielding clubs,shields,and impromptu flame throwers... neither side is the good guys?

Color me shocked!

If they both started it, sure. But when it's one group attacking the citizens of a city no. Also we really don't need another Nazi apologist.

[Jeezy911]

I'm going to go with the side that has a literal terrorist group and a group that wants to exterminate all Jews is a lot fucking worse than the citizens of Charlottesville trying to defend their city from violent far right protesters.

Moral high ground 5. Violence is ok as long as it is against my beliefs.

[draynay]

Not everyone on the Alt-right are Nazi's. They may be red-necks, or something like that. But not Nazi's.

And not everyone on the Alt-left are terrorists, either.

Infact, I was once a liberal, and I voted Trump. So, I don't get the point in saying that i'm defending Nazi's. Cause, clearly, i'm not.

Ok, now I know why you don't understand anything.

[Wyrt]

Not everyone on the Alt-right are Nazi's. They may be red-necks, or something like that. But not Nazi's.

And not everyone on the Alt-left are terrorists, either.

Infact, I was once a liberal, and I voted Trump. So, I don't get the point in saying that i'm defending Nazi's. Cause, clearly, i'm not.

There's no such thing as the alt-left.

The alt-right is a rebranding of neo-nazis to try to be more socially acceptable. They have shown what they are. And it should painfully clear after this past weekend.

[TheFirstOnes]

Oh my lord. 26+ replies in this forum alone. Oh god.

[Xeones]

Not everyone on the Alt-right are Nazi's. They may be red-necks, or something like that. But not Nazi's.

And not everyone on the Alt-left are terrorists, either.

Infact, I was once a liberal, and I voted Trump. So, I don't get the point in saying that i'm defending Nazi's. Cause, clearly, i'm not.

This is factually false, white nationalism is a tenant of the alt-right as defined by the alt-right who coined the term and defined it themselves.

[GennGreymane]

Moral high ground 5. Violence is ok as long as it is against my beliefs.

So is this the ground you're on?

[BuckSparkles]

Not everyone on the Alt-right are Nazi's. They may be red-necks, or something like that. But not Nazi's.

And not everyone on the Alt-left are terrorists, either.

Infact, I was once a liberal, and I voted Trump. So, I don't get the point in saying that i'm defending Nazi's. Cause, clearly, i'm not.

No use arguing. They are quite clearly unhinged atm.

Except Genn. Genn understands me <#

[GennGreymane]

No use arguing. They are quite clearly unhinged atm.

Except Genn. Genn understands me <#

Indeed. Thats not a good thing though. You need creativity

[TheFirstOnes]

There's no such thing as the alt-left.

The alt-right is a rebranding of neo-nazis to try to be more socially acceptable. They have shown what they are.

If there's no such thing as an Alt-left, then why is there an Alt-right?

They both exist, dude. Whether you like it or not, everything has its own correspondent.

[Cthulhu 2020]

Do keep in mind you are talking about people who would find a way to complain if Trump cured cancer all on his own.

This is hilarious on two fronts, considering that one, these posters are able to give props where they're due for Republicans, and for two, you telling us last page about your opinion of all Democrats and how everything they do is despicable.

You're also the guy who refuses to condemn America's nazis killing people so... not sure anyone really wants your support here.

[Xeones]

Moral high ground 5. Violence is ok as long as it is against my beliefs.

It's just you, trump and the nazis using that kind of rhetoric.

[Adam Jensen]

Hey fella, these people (the ones who went to that rally) side with that type of ideology, that's what i'm saying



The only "good" Nazi that i can think about is Rommel

And he was less Nazi and more proud German nationalist.

Not absolving Rommel of his sins, but among the Nazis, he was the least terrible. At least he had the balls to try to do something to stop Hitler in the July 20 bomb plot.

[primalmatter]

If they both started it, sure. But when it's one group attacking the citizens of a city no. Also we really don't need another Nazi apologist.

Problem is they both are. They are mirror imagines of each other. You need to crush both. While it seems antifa and blm in the states are in the decline they remain a threat to its citizens. The nazi thing honestly took me a bit by surprise. I saw it coming but I expected it would take another decade. Key to them is to disburse them early and often with police interaction.

[Elegiac]

If there's no such thing as an Alt-left, then why is there an Alt-right?

They both exist, dude. Whether you like it or not, everything has its own correspondent.

Because 'alt' is short for 'alternative', as in 'an alternative form of the right wing distinct from modern neoconservatism'.

What are English.

[Jeezy911]

In your silly situation, I'll stand with the groups that have single, or maybe double-digit body counts and do not have calls for genocide as a core tenant of their ideologies. Instead of a group who does call for genocide, and nearly succeeded, ending with 8-digit body counts, including millions of innocent, unarmed men, women, and children.

Do you feel comfortable siding with them?

In reality, I'll condemn the fringe elements of BLM while supporting the core beliefs of BLM. I'll always condemn and reject Antifa, they're as bad as the fascists they claim to hate. I'll also have no issues standing against white supremacists, the KKK, and Nazi's, who are all worse than any of the aforementioned groups.

You stand with white supremacists. I don't.

Moral high ground.... shit lost count. Defending bad actions for the greater good.

[Wyrt]

If there's no such thing as an Alt-left, then why is there an Alt-right?

They both exist, dude. Whether you like it or not, everything has its own correspondent.

The alt-right exists because the alt-right made the alt-right. That's the name they fucking gave themselves.