Way too many variables, way too small a sample size and way too short a study.
For this you'd need to run the study over at least 10, better 15 years, have thousands of participants and a control group and follow them over the course of those 15 years to see how shooter players diverge from the control group. Even better to have 2 control groups: Non-Gamers and players of other games.
You don't gain or lose brain matter over the course of just 90 hours. The only thing that can do that is a lobotomy.
Last edited by Krawu; 2017-08-18 at 10:24 AM.
Don't you go coming after my Borderlands....them's fighting words.
Do they have less grey matter because they play the game or do they play the game because they have less grey matter?
Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads"Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab
Pretty sure everything we do is detrimental to us in one way or another, just enjoy yourself and do anything that's obviously harmful to you in moderation.
I didn't say it caused brain damage, I said it was bad for you just as gambling is in a different way.
- - - Updated - - -
It was a personal problem but it is indicative of a larger problem. Drug consumption among the unemployed is another problem as well but that doesn't mean video games aren't also a problem.
You kinda did. You were agreeing with the study to some degree because of your experience, but your experience has no relation to the topic. Video games largely aren't bad, but people can have issues due to their own mental state.... This is like comparing apples to airplanes, since the study wasn't about that, but actual brain activity.
Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads"Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab
I bet shooting at each other for real is even more dangerous! But I sadly can't link a solid research on that
This is why I don't trust any study.
Video games are more different from each other than movies and books.
There is NFS like racing games, and there is turn based strategies like Civilization. Not all folks playing video games have addiction to them, there is folks who play only for 20-30mins evry 2-3days or even a week.
There is much more ppl addicted to movies and TV series, those ppl spending much more life on time on movies/TV series than average casual player on video games and when you playing offline games you can pause it or quit it any time without screwing experience for your team members and friends.
I doubt it's the amount of gaming, but the lack of other activity instead.
I heard as time passes you get brain damage too. By the time your 100 its fucked. Stop aging today. Die.