This is an absolute travesty. I can understand why Harvard would rescind the acceptance of people who posted racist memes on the internet, but this case is nothing like that. This woman served her time, so why should Harvard hold it against her that she just so happened to beat her 4 year old to death 20 years ago? At least she got a nice write up in the New York Times over the whole issue.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/13/u...imes&smtyp=cur
infracted - trollingElizabeth Hinton, one of the Harvard historians who backed Ms. Jones, called her “one of the strongest candidates in the country last year, period.” The case “throws into relief,” she added, the question of “how much do we really believe in the possibility of human redemption?”
The Marshall Project, a nonprofit news organization that focuses on criminal justice and produced this article for The New York Times, obtained internal emails and memos related to Ms. Jones’s application, and interviewed eight professors and administrators involved in reviewing it.
While top Harvard officials typically rubber-stamp departmental admissions decisions, in this case the university’s leadership — including the president, provost, and deans of the graduate school — reversed one, according to the emails and interviews, out of concern that her background would cause a backlash among rejected applicants, conservative news outlets or parents of students.