Mark Zuckerberg has announced that he has already turned over much of this information to special counsel Mueller. Facebook generally did not stop or try to hinder any kind of advertisement of any sort that came through their site unless it was grossly obscene.
It turns out that over 3,000 ads on Facebook, either attacking Hillary or singing the praises of Trump, were found to have been funded by Russian sources. Now the question is, why did Russian agencies sink so much money into absolutely ensuring Trump won? What was their motivation, what did they stand to gain from it? Nobody spends that kind of money without some ulterior motive...
So we either have,
1) Wild speculation that Trump would be favorable towards Russia or, the more likely scenario...
2) Trump and/or members of his campaign team (Manafort *cough*) made certain promises in exchange for "help" with the 2016 election.
Every action has a motive, and that kind of money isn't spent on a whim. We're also discovering that naturally, facebook wasn't the only one that accepted money to run pro-Trump or Anti-Hillary ads.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...amid-pressure/
https://www.axios.com/facebook-will-...488039306.html
http://www.newsweek.com/russias-pro-...-hiding-668374
Alone, this piece of information means very little. You sit down to the table and look at this individual piece of information and it's indeed a nothingburger. Of course, those who like to declare incidents like this as nothingburgers are very narrow visioned. They don't see the other 1328912 burgers at the table that add up to something far more than a single incident that means very little taken out of context. It will be interesting to see Mueller's final report on all of this. Even if there wasn't collusion, we know that Russia had an active hand in influencing our election.
And before someone jumps on the high horse of "WELL THE US HAS INTERFERED IN OTHER ELECTIONS SO YOU CAN'T BE MAD ABOUT IT!" - Judging by previous threads, those who are mad about Russia meddling in our election don't look favorably on the US meddling in other country's elections either, so that little tidbit of "hypocrisy" that some of you may have hoped to point out just shows your desperation to draw attention away from anything.
@Skroe, This ain't a huge deal, but it's another piece of the puzzle, another thread in the tapestry.