Is there a reason OP made this post, as in recent examples of people misusing the word? Because whenever I see people use it, it would seem to absolutely fit the definition and isn't being used to simply describe someone disagreeing on something.
Basically, I'm just confused as to why this post is needed as misuse of the word does not seem to be much of an issue.
When I hear "toxic" in online gaming, I think of edgy teenagers with a Dunning-Kruger outlook on their abilities yelling at and insulting both their opponents and their teammates, including those who are actually far better at the game.
One thing that always amuses me in these threads where it shows someone who isn't the average Left-leaning person getting offended, is how throat-jumpy the usual stalwarts defenders of "We must avoid offending people"-mentality call for jokes about thin-skin and whatnots.
So if I were to call OP a certain word that is defined as "a bundle of sticks", I shouldn't be infracted?
Bait thread is full of bait
Big difference. In this example the word has two completely different uses. Nobody would use that word to get the same reaction as they would from calling you a bundle of sticks or to try and convince anyone that you actually are a bundle of sticks. Whereas words like misogynist, supremacist, racist, communist and so on... are willfully misused and having their definitions expanded, in order to use them as weapons because of the reaction most people have to those terms based on the traditional definitions.