Argus in 2018 My prediction failed in part... But I'm still a Spacegoat
that's more than what goblin get, or the worst punchbag: what gnomes get, and they are in wow since vanilla
gnomes are only race that isn't in any cinematic of the game, I seriously was expecting them in TBC
- - - Updated - - -
they can still redeem her, and as one of the very few wc3 heroes left, i still wait for that
Seriously Varian would fit far better in the 'I HATE ORKS' figure than Jaina, for whatever reason they decided to make jaina the warmonger and varian anger management the calm one
The beginning of wisdom is the statement 'I do not know.' The person who cannot make that statement is one who will never learn anything. And I have prided myself on my ability to learn
Thrall
http://youtu.be/x3ejO7Nssj8 7:20+ "Alliance remaining super power", clearly blizz favor horde too much, that they made alliance the super power
I forgot to add that considering recent lore, I know that I should stay reserved with my wishes(this is why I only said what I rougly expect and now what I want). So I'm gonna share it for others :P
www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6nSo4W-C8s
I miss Mists of Pandaria
Enough with "expansion leaders", it's just a garbage excuse to turn a couple of characters into attention whores while neglecting everyone else. This shit is making me miss MoP and that's not good.
Thrall didn't give even a quarter of the quests Khadgar gave in the last two expansions to Horde and Alliance alike. Thrall became Horde-exclusive content again the moment Cataclysm ended.
I would like to see a badass thrall again.
But dear god just get rid of khadgar, he annoys me.
That is because Legion is a continuation of what happened in WoD more so than any other expansion was to another in the past. In addition to this, the number of quests given by an "expansion leader" can hardly define the importance of the character to the lore at a certain point; Thrall was much more important in Cataclysm than Khadgar is in Legion, although Khadgar does give too many quests in Legion. These are however trivial in comparison to "healing a wound in the world" or outright shooting the big bad guy out of the sky.
Besides, the point of my post was to show that there will always be someone who is unhappy no matter what.
Last edited by Magnagarde; 2017-10-11 at 10:11 PM.
Because those characters serve only to be part of marketing and small "micro" story within expansion, rather than big, overarching story most people want.
Take example of farondis. Anyone gives a fuck ? Like really ? Nope. Will he ever reappear ? No. In the essence, all spotlight he took is "wasted" because this story can never be reused. Same goes for many other "queen of a day" characters like yrel (whom we will never see again), most orcs in WoD who got discared, and any teritorial characters like for instance ebonhorn.
Comparing Thrall in Cata with Khadgar in WoD and Legion is just dumb. Khadgar's role has been nothing but the supplementary. Thrall's role in Cata was the chosen one whose prophecy came out of nowhere. We even dealt with his personality's disorders and witnessed his marriage.
Last edited by Wildmoon; 2017-10-12 at 09:25 AM.
This doesn't change the fact that Khadgar has been nothing but omnipresent throughout the course of two expansions. The fact that he didn't hold the same importance of Thrall in the overall plot has little to do with the exhaustation players feel by dealing with a character that is almost everywhere and act as deo facto leader of everyone.
While important to WoD, Khadgar didn't really feel "omnipresent" to me. He was involved in the Legendary ring side-quests and made his main appearance in Hellfire Citadel, but other than that he was pretty unobtrusive down there in his tower in Talador. He's definitely a more central figure in Legion being the nominal head of the Kirin Tor and being involved in many, many quests and events.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead