Smart people are better at making money, so people with better genes will be more often rich.
Now it's your turn. How do you explain that black kids adopted by rich white people as babies perform worse than adopted white kids? It's the same environment (adopted by rich white people).
See: https://i.imgur.com/XnefUAj.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnes...Adoption_Study
Err... a kid who went through adoption lived traumatizing events that damage his performance on a biased test? He is bullied as a black kid in a white school? Teachers are racists and don't give him the same opportunities? Could be lots of reasons.
And what about the part where the gap is shrinking? And the averages are constantly getting higher and they have to increase the test difficulty? Are people evolving or receiving better education?
IQ test is limited.
I have nothing against Asians and (ancient)Arabs.
All of those that you mentioned were either Arabs, Chinese, etc. Not blacks. In ancient history blacks haven't discovered jackshit. In modern history they are even less relevant. Back then it was Arabs, Chinese and Whites(Greeks, Romans, etc), in modern history it's only Asians and Whites since Arabs went full retard with Islam.
- - - Updated - - -
What I wrote above, plus don't discredit Greeks and Romans.
- - - Updated - - -
Their results were compared to ADOPTED white kids.
Of course. It's always the evil whitey who keeps them down.
[Infracted]
Last edited by Endus; 2017-10-11 at 12:56 AM.
The resident basement dweller have still to explain why the 100% pure white WASPs of Salem believed in witchcraft in 1690. He still have to explain how a double digits percentage of American believe in satanic conspiracies in 2017.
- - - Updated - - -
No, based on the hysterical ramblings of Gobineau and co. You know, the dudes coopted by the Waffen SS cosplayers who scream WHITE POWAH.
So your racist arguments lead you to say there is no racism. I honestly don't know how to go on from here.
Also, from the study:
How can that be explained by genetics?The study found that age at adoption was significantly associated with measured IQs
And again, the gap is shrinking, the test needs to constantly be made harder for the averages not to climb, and how can this be explained if education doesn't play a role?
The IQ test is flawed.
It's fairly obvious to note comparisons to witch burnings in Hyper-Religious Europe and how they emerged out of that (through many means and causes). This doesn't look much different. African countries for the most part are lagging very far behind the world in enlightenment and social progress. Their societies are still far too tribalistic, low-GDP, high-fertility, low-education, traditionalistic, religious/spiritual, etc... Basically where Europe was 5 centuries ago. And yes, it's pretty much economy/geography -> culture which explains the situation. You can't avoid the fact that culture is not simply arbitrary but dependent on one's material circumstances.
I'd like to remind people that Afrocentrism is generally connected to this mentality and punishes people who want to think scientifically, rationally, and in a secular fashion (remember, those things are white man's inventions of oppression, we need to embrace traditional African ways of living). The kids in Ivy league schools preaching about how rationality and science are white supremacy are feeding this ignorance.
- - - Updated - - -
Well you should note that white isn't the same as caucasian. A fair amount of Indians are related to caucasians but have darker skin. Even a decent amount of Arabs are darker skinned but still caucasian. I'm not sure why or when Caucasian became synonymous with white.
Last edited by Kraenen; 2017-10-10 at 11:31 PM.
This isn't really a 'gotcha' moment. Jews typically measured low in IQ when they came to America. But equalize social status, the material scaffolding (education, wealth), and they didn't just equalize in IQ, but they rose to the top (at least verbal IQ). The same can be said about Asians (east-asians more specifically). So if someone is more intelligent on a genetic or hereditary level, they can still be kept back by their circumstances. Once those are alleviated or equalized, you'll see the (fairly substantial) effect of nature that outshines nurture.
Last edited by Kraenen; 2017-10-10 at 11:34 PM.
I didn't say that. But there is no basis for claiming that a professional teacher picked on black kids for no reason and gave them bad grades on purpose. They already perform worse than whites, no reason to kick into them.
Both can be a factor. Both race and the age when the kid got into a good environment. Again, white kids were also affected by earlier or later adoption.
Very few things in this world are perfect. That doesn't mean that they are all wrong and should be discarded.
Again, French and American ''scientists'' repeatedly came to the conclusion that Vietnamese were unable to fight...
Besides, again(er). In a site cited daily by people on this forum, in 2017, people believe like in the Gospel in Satanist conspiracies and plots. They believed that there was satanists in a pizzeria, FFS.
Last edited by sarahtasher; 2017-10-10 at 11:57 PM.
Just goes to show, these hellholes will never change because of the naturally lower IQ of the populations. It's the reason you have countries like Zimbabwe prospering under white rule, but then they kick out the whites and go from Africa's bread basket to begging white farmers to come back because the population is starving. Same shit in South Africa now, or basically any major US city with a large black population.
https://www.hotslogs.com/Player/Prof...ayerID=1579599
"MMOC forums let me keep my job again. Whew." -Greg "Ghostcrawler" Street
Jared Taylor is an extraordinarily WASPy individual who acknowledges that Europeans as a whole get outscored consistently on IQ tests by Northeast Asians. He's one of the biggest names (and has been for some time) among those trying to combat brain dead race-creationism. So if you haven't seen it, then you're just not looking hard enough, and that's on you.
I'm just going to take a guess and assume it's much easier for you to cast your opposition as Nazis, trudge out long-dead racial theorists that the HBD crowd pays no attention to, and pretend that we still take phrenology seriously.
You know, if you actually bothered to interact with what the opposition is saying, instead of what you think they're saying, you might learn something.
And no, Nazis were never about defending the "white race," I never claimed that, nor have I said anything to imply such a thing. The Nazis are entirely irrelevant to my position and this discussion as a whole. Can you please stop being so spooked by a ~97 year old defunct political party?
Last edited by Wildberry; 2017-10-11 at 12:08 AM.
Yeah, mysteriously, it's way harder to turn a profit on businesses like, I don't know, cotton mills, when you have to actually PAY the workforce instead of whipping them or killing them.
I mean, it's not very hard to understand isn'it ? Those ''profitable'' farms in Zimbabwe and those ''profitable'' mines in South Africa were profitable because of a workforce that cost less than a Gulag prisonner.