Is there a lore reason why we killed L'ura instead of cleansing her?
Is there a lore reason why we killed L'ura instead of cleansing her?
It is extremely rare for a Naaru to be redeemed, far more rare than it is for one to even fall that far into shadow. K'ara and S'aara are the only two Naaru ever known to be recovered from a darkened or Void state. Recovering K'ara in WoD required the sacrifice of Velen to achieve, and S'aara was only recovered by utilizing Azeroth's most powerful Priests all together and with the assistance of one of the mighty Priest Artifacts. L'ura, being deep in enemy territory and in an inaccessible location, didn't really have a cleansing in the cards for her future, sadly.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
I think Xal'atath gets enough feeding in Legion to be honest. I'm actually a bit worried about Xal'atath, Aluneth, and Ulthalesh in the future - all of those weapons have a malevolent sentience within them and it would be singularly bad if it somehow slipped away at some future point.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Don't forget the 3 DK artifacts. Only the Maw of the Damned has any vestige of sentience, but all 3 weapons are extremely dangerous in their own right.
My understanding is that in BfA Azeroth is dying from Sargeras' wound, and the Heart acts as a way to collect her lifeblood and put it to use. She's past the point of defending, and the best we can hope to do is salvage her remains.
I think all three of the DK Artifact weapons need a wielder and aren't exclusively sentient in the way that Xal'atath, Aluneth, and Ulthalesh are. The Maw of the Damned just has a non-sentient hunger for life - it no longer thinks in any real way outside an endless and gnawing need to consume. Apocalypse and the Blades of the Fallen Prince are just intensely powerful weapons with a bevy of destructive powers. Though I do wonder if some trace of the echoes of Arthas and Ner'zhul remain in the Blades despite having been purged by the Deathlord.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Aluneth is just a fucking douche. Not evil. And I believe Maw actually talks
Personal Preference and Opinions ≠ Facts, Truth, or Logic
I've never heard it talk on my DK - random people only occasionally mention that it "looks hungry" as I pass them. I did forget the Skull of the Man'ari, though; it's pretty yappy but I don't think it's a threat on the same order as the previously mentioned three.
- - - Updated - - -
Aluneth isn't malevolent in the quite the same manner, true; but it's disdainful appraisal of nearly everything, its capriciousness, and its incessant hunger for magic would definitely put it high on the danger scale.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
After Xe'ra showed that Naaru are evil as fuck, we'll kill every Naaru we can get our hands on...
THAT'S WHY!
- - - Updated - - -
After Xe'ra showed that Naaru are evil as fuck, we'll kill every Naaru we can get our hands on...
THAT'S WHY!
Fact (because I say so): TBC > Cata > Legion > ShaLa > MoP > DF > BfA > WoD = WotLK
My pet collection --> http://www.warcraftpets.com/collection/FuxieDK/
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
That wrap claiming revenge on KJ... That's some interesting lore implications...
Leave my character's husbando alone (and by alone I mean with her :3). No, seriously, I'll miss Aluneth. I hope we can un-staff him.
As to your question about L'ura - most likely she's just a plot device for Alleria and Void Elves.